From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: 2.6.38-rc3-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.36 -> 2.6.37 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:42:05 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20110203112316.GA3718@linux-yscl.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110203112316.GA3718@linux-yscl.site> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Carlos R. Mafra" , Keith Packard , Dave Airlie Cc: Linux SCSI List , Linux ACPI , Network Development , Linux Wireless List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , DRI , Florian Mickler , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , Linux PM List , Maciej Rutecki List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > On Thu =A03.Feb'11 at =A01:03:41 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.36 regressions, please let = us know >> either and we'll add them to the list. =A0Also, please let us know if any >> of the entries below are invalid. > > I'm sorry if I'm overlooking something, but as far as I can see the regre= ssion > reported here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/1/24/457 > > is not in the list (update on that report: reverting that commit on top of > 2.6.37 fixes the issue). Ok, added Keith and Dave to the cc, since they are the signers of that comm= it. > After some time, I also ended up finding an earlier report in the kernel = bugzilla > which I think is the same regression (it was bisected to the same commit): > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D24982 > > but I do not see it in the list either, even though it's marked as a > regression in the bugzilla. > > The issue was also present in 2.6.38-rc2 last time I tested. Just to confirm, can you also check -rc3? I'm pretty sure nothing has changed, but there were a few drm patches after -rc2, so it's alsways good to double-check. Keithp? Linus