From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Franz Sirl To: Eric Ding Subject: Re: ld bug with -Bsymbolic --noinhibit-exec (2.9.1.0.990418-1c) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 22:40:31 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org References: <199906161938.PAA10763@tuxedo.applix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <99061622444300.00949@ns1102.munich.netsurf.de> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Am Mit, 16 Jun 1999 schrieb Eric Ding: >Hi Franz, > >>>>>> Franz Sirl writes: > >> Ok, would you mind trying binutils-2.9.4.0.5 on Intel too? It's >> available on >> as a RPM. > >> I'm trying to sort out if this is related to newer binutils or if it's >> PPC specific. > >just noticed I called you Frank last time. Sorry 'bout that. :) no problem :-). I didn't even notice... >I had a co-worker test out the Intel 2.9.4.0.5 binutils and it worked >without a problem on that hardware platform. Hmm, I browsed thru the binutils code and didn't see anything suspicious. Is there any chance you can strip that down to a small testcase with a few symbols? That would help debugging a lot. >> BTW, I'm "franzo" on #mklinux/EFNet for even faster feedback :-) > >I don't have irc access from work (this is irc, right?)... Yes, irc. Franz. [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]] [[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]