From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Franz Sirl To: Tom Vier , Tom Vier , Franz Sirl Subject: Re: egcs-1.1.1-1c bug (was Re: major ksyms problem) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 22:15:02 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: mklinux-development-system@public.lists.apple.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <99022322220600.00836@ns1102.munich.netsurf.de> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Am Tue, 23 Feb 1999 schrieb Tom Vier: >On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Franz Sirl wrote: > >> At 15:36 22.02.99 , Tom Vier wrote: >> > >> >it's an egcs bug. i think it's not aligning instructions properly, cuz >> >i believe the 601 is more strict about alignment. is anyone having >> >problems using bsd_comp.o, ppp_deflate.o, and hfs.o on a non-601 >> >machine built under pre-R5 (egcs-1.1.1-1c)? >> >> What makes you think that it is an egcs bug? I have no problems on 601 >> (7200/75) with any of the modules you listed. Are you sure you have the >> latest modutils (2.1.121 or later) installed? > >it is an egcs bug. egcs-1.1.1-1c failss to build working bsd_comp.o, >ppp_deflate.o, and hfs.o; egcs-1.0-2e.ppc.rpm builds it perfectly. i'm >getting a newer build of egcs right now, to see if it's fixed. What is the problem with these modules? Give a better description on what you mean with "working"? They work perfectly for me with a self-compiled 2.2.1 kernel, and I compiled working modules with multiple kernel versions since the egcs-1.1 alpha phase. If your only problem is the "unhandled relocation type", install a newer modutils package (>=2.1.121), that will fix it. Franz. [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]] [[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]