From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@google.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Joel Selvaraj <jo@jsfamily.in>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Cong Yang <yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] drm/mipi-dsi: Reduce bloat and add funcs for cleaner init seqs
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 12:20:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzkg4jb3.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240426235857.3870424-1-dianders@chromium.org>
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> The consensus of many DRM folks is that we want to move away from DSI
> drivers defining tables of init commands. Instead, we want to move to
> init functions that can use common DRM functions. The issue thus far
> has been that using the macros mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq() and
> mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq() bloats the driver using them.
>
> While trying to solve bloat, we realized that the majority of the it
> was easy to solve. This series solves the bloat for existing drivers
> by moving the printout outside of the macro.
>
> During discussion of my v1 patch to fix the bloat [1], we also decided
> that we really want to change the way that drivers deal with init
> sequences to make it clearer. In addition to being cleaner, a side
> effect of moving drivers to the new style reduces bloat _even more_.
>
> This series also contains a few minor fixes / cleanups that I found
> along the way.
FWIW, I like the general approach taken here. Thanks!
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-29 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-26 23:58 [PATCH v2 0/8] drm/mipi-dsi: Reduce bloat and add funcs for cleaner init seqs Douglas Anderson
2024-04-26 23:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/mipi-dsi: Fix theoretical int overflow in mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq() Douglas Anderson
2024-04-27 1:44 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-04-27 6:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2024-04-29 21:42 ` Doug Anderson
2024-04-26 23:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/mipi-dsi: Fix theoretical int overflow in mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq() Douglas Anderson
2024-04-26 23:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] drm/mipi-dsi: Reduce driver bloat of mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() Douglas Anderson
2024-04-27 2:05 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-04-26 23:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/mipi-dsi: Introduce mipi_dsi_*_write_seq_multi() Douglas Anderson
2024-04-27 6:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2024-04-29 14:13 ` Doug Anderson
2024-04-29 9:38 ` Neil Armstrong
2024-04-29 14:26 ` Doug Anderson
2024-04-29 15:39 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-01 15:49 ` Doug Anderson
2024-05-01 15:57 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-06 6:21 ` Linus Walleij
2024-04-26 23:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] drm/mipi-dsi: mipi_dsi_*_write functions don't need to ratelimit prints Douglas Anderson
2024-04-26 23:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/panel: novatek-nt36672e: Switch to mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi() Douglas Anderson
2024-04-26 23:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] drm/panel: boe-tv101wum-nl6: Don't use a table for initting commands Douglas Anderson
2024-04-26 23:58 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] drm/panel: boe-tv101wum-nl6: Convert hex to lowercase Douglas Anderson
2024-04-27 8:48 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-04-29 9:20 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jzkg4jb3.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hsinyi@google.com \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=jo@jsfamily.in \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.