All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match and address range support
@ 2024-02-29 15:07 Sven Schnelle
  2024-02-29 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match Sven Schnelle
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sven Schnelle @ 2024-02-29 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Alex Bennée, Alexandre Iooss, Mahmoud Mandour,
	Pierrick Bouvier
  Cc: qemu-devel, deller, Sven Schnelle

Hi List,

this patchset adds a new -dfilter option and address range matching. With this
execlog can match only a certain range of address for both instruction and
data adresses.

Example usage:

qemu-system-xxx <other options> -d plugin -plugin libexeclog.so,afilter=0x1000-0x2000,dfilter=0x388

This would only log instruction in the address range 0x1000 to 0x2000
and accessing data at address 0x388.

Changes in v2:
- rebased on top of latest master

Sven Schnelle (3):
  plugins/execlog: pass matches array to parse_vaddr_match
  plugins/execlog: add data address match
  plugins/execlog: add address range matching

 contrib/plugins/execlog.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match
  2024-02-29 15:07 [PATCH 0/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match and address range support Sven Schnelle
@ 2024-02-29 15:07 ` Sven Schnelle
  2024-02-29 15:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] plugins/execlog: add address range matching Sven Schnelle
  2024-02-29 17:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match and address range support Alex Bennée
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sven Schnelle @ 2024-02-29 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Alex Bennée, Alexandre Iooss, Mahmoud Mandour,
	Pierrick Bouvier
  Cc: qemu-devel, deller, Sven Schnelle

Add a match similar to the afilter address match, but for data
addresses. When an address is specified with '-dfilter=0x12345'
only load/stores to/from address 0x12345 are printed. All other
instructions are hidden.

Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org>
---
 contrib/plugins/execlog.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/plugins/execlog.c b/contrib/plugins/execlog.c
index 934553e83d..c89ebc08b6 100644
--- a/contrib/plugins/execlog.c
+++ b/contrib/plugins/execlog.c
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ typedef struct CPU {
     GString *last_exec;
     /* Ptr array of Register */
     GPtrArray *registers;
+    /* whether this instruction should be logged */
+    bool log;
 } CPU;
 
 QEMU_PLUGIN_EXPORT int qemu_plugin_version = QEMU_PLUGIN_VERSION;
@@ -36,6 +38,7 @@ static GRWLock expand_array_lock;
 
 static GPtrArray *imatches;
 static GArray *amatches;
+static GArray *dmatches;
 static GPtrArray *rmatches;
 static bool disas_assist;
 static GMutex add_reg_name_lock;
@@ -51,6 +54,17 @@ static CPU *get_cpu(int vcpu_index)
     return c;
 }
 
+static bool match_vaddr(uint64_t vaddr)
+{
+    for (int i = 0; i < dmatches->len; i++) {
+        uint64_t v = g_array_index(dmatches, uint64_t, i);
+        if (v == vaddr) {
+            return true;
+        }
+    }
+    return false;
+}
+
 /**
  * Add memory read or write information to current instruction log
  */
@@ -62,6 +76,11 @@ static void vcpu_mem(unsigned int cpu_index, qemu_plugin_meminfo_t info,
 
     /* Find vCPU in array */
 
+    if (dmatches && !match_vaddr(vaddr)) {
+        return;
+    }
+    c->log = true;
+
     /* Indicate type of memory access */
     if (qemu_plugin_mem_is_store(info)) {
         g_string_append(s, ", store");
@@ -121,15 +140,17 @@ static void vcpu_insn_exec_with_regs(unsigned int cpu_index, void *udata)
         if (cpu->registers) {
             insn_check_regs(cpu);
         }
-
-        qemu_plugin_outs(cpu->last_exec->str);
-        qemu_plugin_outs("\n");
+        if (cpu->log) {
+            qemu_plugin_outs(cpu->last_exec->str);
+            qemu_plugin_outs("\n");
+        }
     }
 
     /* Store new instruction in cache */
     /* vcpu_mem will add memory access information to last_exec */
     g_string_printf(cpu->last_exec, "%u, ", cpu_index);
     g_string_append(cpu->last_exec, (char *)udata);
+    cpu->log = dmatches ? false : true;
 }
 
 /* Log last instruction while checking registers, ignore next */
@@ -166,6 +187,7 @@ static void vcpu_insn_exec(unsigned int cpu_index, void *udata)
     /* vcpu_mem will add memory access information to last_exec */
     g_string_printf(cpu->last_exec, "%u, ", cpu_index);
     g_string_append(cpu->last_exec, (char *)udata);
+    cpu->log = dmatches ? false : true;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -381,7 +403,7 @@ static void plugin_exit(qemu_plugin_id_t id, void *p)
     g_rw_lock_reader_lock(&expand_array_lock);
     for (i = 0; i < cpus->len; i++) {
         CPU *c = get_cpu(i);
-        if (c->last_exec && c->last_exec->str) {
+        if (c->log && c->last_exec && c->last_exec->str) {
             qemu_plugin_outs(c->last_exec->str);
             qemu_plugin_outs("\n");
         }
@@ -441,6 +463,8 @@ QEMU_PLUGIN_EXPORT int qemu_plugin_install(qemu_plugin_id_t id,
             parse_insn_match(tokens[1]);
         } else if (g_strcmp0(tokens[0], "afilter") == 0) {
             parse_vaddr_match(&amatches, tokens[1]);
+        } else if (g_strcmp0(tokens[0], "dfilter") == 0) {
+            parse_vaddr_match(&dmatches, tokens[1]);
         } else if (g_strcmp0(tokens[0], "reg") == 0) {
             add_regpat(tokens[1]);
         } else if (g_strcmp0(tokens[0], "rdisas") == 0) {
-- 
2.43.2



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] plugins/execlog: add address range matching
  2024-02-29 15:07 [PATCH 0/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match and address range support Sven Schnelle
  2024-02-29 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match Sven Schnelle
@ 2024-02-29 15:07 ` Sven Schnelle
  2024-02-29 17:12   ` Alex Bennée
  2024-02-29 17:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match and address range support Alex Bennée
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sven Schnelle @ 2024-02-29 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Alex Bennée, Alexandre Iooss, Mahmoud Mandour,
	Pierrick Bouvier
  Cc: qemu-devel, deller, Sven Schnelle

Allow to match memory ranges with the address matches. This
allows to give a range of adresses like '-dfilter=0-0x400'
which would only log memory accesses between 0 and 400.

Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org>
---
 contrib/plugins/execlog.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/plugins/execlog.c b/contrib/plugins/execlog.c
index c89ebc08b6..b1b2a7baf1 100644
--- a/contrib/plugins/execlog.c
+++ b/contrib/plugins/execlog.c
@@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ static bool disas_assist;
 static GMutex add_reg_name_lock;
 static GPtrArray *all_reg_names;
 
+struct address_match {
+    uint64_t low;
+    uint64_t high;
+};
+
 static CPU *get_cpu(int vcpu_index)
 {
     CPU *c;
@@ -54,11 +59,12 @@ static CPU *get_cpu(int vcpu_index)
     return c;
 }
 
-static bool match_vaddr(uint64_t vaddr)
+static bool match_address_range(GArray *match, uint64_t vaddr)
 {
-    for (int i = 0; i < dmatches->len; i++) {
-        uint64_t v = g_array_index(dmatches, uint64_t, i);
-        if (v == vaddr) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < match->len; i++) {
+        struct address_match *m =
+            g_array_index(match, struct address_match *, i);
+        if (vaddr >= m->low && vaddr <= m->high) {
             return true;
         }
     }
@@ -74,9 +80,7 @@ static void vcpu_mem(unsigned int cpu_index, qemu_plugin_meminfo_t info,
     CPU *c = get_cpu(cpu_index);
     GString *s = c->last_exec;
 
-    /* Find vCPU in array */
-
-    if (dmatches && !match_vaddr(vaddr)) {
+    if (dmatches && !match_address_range(dmatches, vaddr)) {
         return;
     }
     c->log = true;
@@ -164,8 +168,10 @@ static void vcpu_insn_exec_only_regs(unsigned int cpu_index, void *udata)
             insn_check_regs(cpu);
         }
 
-        qemu_plugin_outs(cpu->last_exec->str);
-        qemu_plugin_outs("\n");
+        if (cpu->log) {
+            qemu_plugin_outs(cpu->last_exec->str);
+            qemu_plugin_outs("\n");
+        }
     }
 
     /* reset */
@@ -178,7 +184,7 @@ static void vcpu_insn_exec(unsigned int cpu_index, void *udata)
     CPU *cpu = get_cpu(cpu_index);
 
     /* Print previous instruction in cache */
-    if (cpu->last_exec->len) {
+    if (cpu->log && cpu->last_exec->len) {
         qemu_plugin_outs(cpu->last_exec->str);
         qemu_plugin_outs("\n");
     }
@@ -239,8 +245,7 @@ static void vcpu_tb_trans(qemu_plugin_id_t id, struct qemu_plugin_tb *tb)
         if (skip && amatches) {
             int j;
             for (j = 0; j < amatches->len && skip; j++) {
-                uint64_t v = g_array_index(amatches, uint64_t, j);
-                if (v == insn_vaddr) {
+                if (match_address_range(amatches, insn_vaddr)) {
                     skip = false;
                 }
             }
@@ -394,6 +399,17 @@ static void vcpu_init(qemu_plugin_id_t id, unsigned int vcpu_index)
     c->registers = registers_init(vcpu_index);
 }
 
+static void free_matches(GArray *matches)
+{
+    if (!matches) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    for (int i = 0; i < matches->len; i++) {
+        g_free(g_array_index(matches, struct address_match *, i));
+    }
+}
+
 /**
  * On plugin exit, print last instruction in cache
  */
@@ -409,6 +425,9 @@ static void plugin_exit(qemu_plugin_id_t id, void *p)
         }
     }
     g_rw_lock_reader_unlock(&expand_array_lock);
+
+    free_matches(amatches);
+    free_matches(dmatches);
 }
 
 /* Add a match to the array of matches */
@@ -420,14 +439,34 @@ static void parse_insn_match(char *match)
     g_ptr_array_add(imatches, g_strdup(match));
 }
 
-static void parse_vaddr_match(GArray **matches, char *match)
+static void parse_vaddr_match(GArray **matches, char *token)
 {
-    uint64_t v = g_ascii_strtoull(match, NULL, 16);
+    uint64_t low, high;
+    gchar *endp;
 
-    if (!matches) {
-        *matches = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(uint64_t));
+    low = g_ascii_strtoull(token, &endp, 16);
+    if (endp == token) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "Invalid address(range) specified: %s\n", token);
+        return;
+    }
+
+    if (*endp != '-') {
+        high = low;
+    } else {
+        high = g_ascii_strtoull(endp + 1, &endp, 16);
+        if (endp == token) {
+            fprintf(stderr, "Invalid address(range) specified: %s\n", token);
+            return;
+        }
+    }
+
+    if (!*matches) {
+        *matches = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(struct address_match));
     }
-    g_array_append_val(*matches, v);
+    struct address_match *match = g_new(struct address_match, 1);
+    match->low = low;
+    match->high = high;
+    g_array_append_val(*matches, match);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.43.2



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match and address range support
  2024-02-29 15:07 [PATCH 0/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match and address range support Sven Schnelle
  2024-02-29 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match Sven Schnelle
  2024-02-29 15:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] plugins/execlog: add address range matching Sven Schnelle
@ 2024-02-29 17:08 ` Alex Bennée
  2024-02-29 19:40   ` Sven Schnelle
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2024-02-29 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Sven Schnelle
  Cc: Alexandre Iooss, Mahmoud Mandour, Pierrick Bouvier, qemu-devel,
	deller

Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org> writes:

> Hi List,
>
> this patchset adds a new -dfilter option and address range matching. With this
> execlog can match only a certain range of address for both instruction and
> data adresses.
>
> Example usage:
>
> qemu-system-xxx <other options> -d plugin -plugin libexeclog.so,afilter=0x1000-0x2000,dfilter=0x388
>
> This would only log instruction in the address range 0x1000 to 0x2000
> and accessing data at address 0x388.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - rebased on top of latest master
>
> Sven Schnelle (3):
>   plugins/execlog: pass matches array to parse_vaddr_match

I think we've lost a patch in the re-posting. patchew hasn't seen it
either:

  https://patchew.org/QEMU/20240229150729.1620410-1-svens@stackframe.org/

>   plugins/execlog: add data address match
>   plugins/execlog: add address range matching
>
>  contrib/plugins/execlog.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/3] plugins/execlog: add address range matching
  2024-02-29 15:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] plugins/execlog: add address range matching Sven Schnelle
@ 2024-02-29 17:12   ` Alex Bennée
  2024-02-29 18:04     ` Sven Schnelle
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2024-02-29 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Sven Schnelle
  Cc: Alexandre Iooss, Mahmoud Mandour, Pierrick Bouvier, qemu-devel,
	deller

Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org> writes:

> Allow to match memory ranges with the address matches. This
> allows to give a range of adresses like '-dfilter=0-0x400'
> which would only log memory accesses between 0 and 400.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org>
> ---
>  contrib/plugins/execlog.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/contrib/plugins/execlog.c b/contrib/plugins/execlog.c
> index c89ebc08b6..b1b2a7baf1 100644
> --- a/contrib/plugins/execlog.c
> +++ b/contrib/plugins/execlog.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ static bool disas_assist;
>  static GMutex add_reg_name_lock;
>  static GPtrArray *all_reg_names;
>  
> +struct address_match {
> +    uint64_t low;
> +    uint64_t high;
> +};
> +
>  static CPU *get_cpu(int vcpu_index)
>  {
>      CPU *c;
> @@ -54,11 +59,12 @@ static CPU *get_cpu(int vcpu_index)
>      return c;
>  }
>  
> -static bool match_vaddr(uint64_t vaddr)
> +static bool match_address_range(GArray *match, uint64_t vaddr)
>  {
> -    for (int i = 0; i < dmatches->len; i++) {
> -        uint64_t v = g_array_index(dmatches, uint64_t, i);
> -        if (v == vaddr) {
> +    for (int i = 0; i < match->len; i++) {
> +        struct address_match *m =
> +            g_array_index(match, struct address_match *, i);
> +        if (vaddr >= m->low && vaddr <= m->high) {
>              return true;
>          }
>      }
> @@ -74,9 +80,7 @@ static void vcpu_mem(unsigned int cpu_index, qemu_plugin_meminfo_t info,
>      CPU *c = get_cpu(cpu_index);
>      GString *s = c->last_exec;
>  
> -    /* Find vCPU in array */
> -
> -    if (dmatches && !match_vaddr(vaddr)) {
> +    if (dmatches && !match_address_range(dmatches, vaddr)) {
>          return;
>      }
>      c->log = true;
> @@ -164,8 +168,10 @@ static void vcpu_insn_exec_only_regs(unsigned int cpu_index, void *udata)
>              insn_check_regs(cpu);
>          }
>  
> -        qemu_plugin_outs(cpu->last_exec->str);
> -        qemu_plugin_outs("\n");
> +        if (cpu->log) {
> +            qemu_plugin_outs(cpu->last_exec->str);
> +            qemu_plugin_outs("\n");
> +        }
>      }
>  
>      /* reset */
> @@ -178,7 +184,7 @@ static void vcpu_insn_exec(unsigned int cpu_index, void *udata)
>      CPU *cpu = get_cpu(cpu_index);
>  
>      /* Print previous instruction in cache */
> -    if (cpu->last_exec->len) {
> +    if (cpu->log && cpu->last_exec->len) {
>          qemu_plugin_outs(cpu->last_exec->str);
>          qemu_plugin_outs("\n");
>      }
> @@ -239,8 +245,7 @@ static void vcpu_tb_trans(qemu_plugin_id_t id, struct qemu_plugin_tb *tb)
>          if (skip && amatches) {
>              int j;
>              for (j = 0; j < amatches->len && skip; j++) {
> -                uint64_t v = g_array_index(amatches, uint64_t, j);
> -                if (v == insn_vaddr) {
> +                if (match_address_range(amatches, insn_vaddr)) {
>                      skip = false;
>                  }
>              }
> @@ -394,6 +399,17 @@ static void vcpu_init(qemu_plugin_id_t id, unsigned int vcpu_index)
>      c->registers = registers_init(vcpu_index);
>  }
>  
> +static void free_matches(GArray *matches)
> +{
> +    if (!matches) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    for (int i = 0; i < matches->len; i++) {
> +        g_free(g_array_index(matches, struct address_match *, i));
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * On plugin exit, print last instruction in cache
>   */
> @@ -409,6 +425,9 @@ static void plugin_exit(qemu_plugin_id_t id, void *p)
>          }
>      }
>      g_rw_lock_reader_unlock(&expand_array_lock);
> +
> +    free_matches(amatches);
> +    free_matches(dmatches);
>  }
>  
>  /* Add a match to the array of matches */
> @@ -420,14 +439,34 @@ static void parse_insn_match(char *match)
>      g_ptr_array_add(imatches, g_strdup(match));
>  }
>  
> -static void parse_vaddr_match(GArray **matches, char *match)
> +static void parse_vaddr_match(GArray **matches, char *token)
>  {
> -    uint64_t v = g_ascii_strtoull(match, NULL, 16);
> +    uint64_t low, high;
> +    gchar *endp;
>  
> -    if (!matches) {
> -        *matches = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(uint64_t));
> +    low = g_ascii_strtoull(token, &endp, 16);
> +    if (endp == token) {
> +        fprintf(stderr, "Invalid address(range) specified: %s\n", token);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (*endp != '-') {
> +        high = low;
> +    } else {
> +        high = g_ascii_strtoull(endp + 1, &endp, 16);
> +        if (endp == token) {
> +            fprintf(stderr, "Invalid address(range) specified: %s\n", token);
> +            return;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    if (!*matches) {
> +        *matches = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(struct address_match));
>      }
> -    g_array_append_val(*matches, v);
> +    struct address_match *match = g_new(struct address_match, 1);
> +    match->low = low;
> +    match->high = high;
> +    g_array_append_val(*matches, match);

This is almost but not quite qemu_set_dfilter_ranges(). I wonder if it
would be worth a light re-factoring and then exposing the parser as a
helper function?

>  }
>  
>  /*

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/3] plugins/execlog: add address range matching
  2024-02-29 17:12   ` Alex Bennée
@ 2024-02-29 18:04     ` Sven Schnelle
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sven Schnelle @ 2024-02-29 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Alex Bennée
  Cc: Alexandre Iooss, Mahmoud Mandour, Pierrick Bouvier, qemu-devel,
	deller

Hi Alex,

Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> writes:

> Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org> writes:
>> +static void parse_vaddr_match(GArray **matches, char *token)
>>  {
>> -    uint64_t v = g_ascii_strtoull(match, NULL, 16);
>> +    uint64_t low, high;
>> +    gchar *endp;
>>  
>> -    if (!matches) {
>> -        *matches = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(uint64_t));
>> +    low = g_ascii_strtoull(token, &endp, 16);
>> +    if (endp == token) {
>> +        fprintf(stderr, "Invalid address(range) specified: %s\n", token);
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (*endp != '-') {
>> +        high = low;
>> +    } else {
>> +        high = g_ascii_strtoull(endp + 1, &endp, 16);
>> +        if (endp == token) {
>> +            fprintf(stderr, "Invalid address(range) specified: %s\n", token);
>> +            return;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (!*matches) {
>> +        *matches = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(struct address_match));
>>      }
>> -    g_array_append_val(*matches, v);
>> +    struct address_match *match = g_new(struct address_match, 1);
>> +    match->low = low;
>> +    match->high = high;
>> +    g_array_append_val(*matches, match);
>
> This is almost but not quite qemu_set_dfilter_ranges(). I wonder if it
> would be worth a light re-factoring and then exposing the parser as a
> helper function?

Thanks, I'll take a look. I wasn't aware of qemu_set_dfilter_ranges().


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match and address range support
  2024-02-29 17:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match and address range support Alex Bennée
@ 2024-02-29 19:40   ` Sven Schnelle
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sven Schnelle @ 2024-02-29 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Alex Bennée
  Cc: Alexandre Iooss, Mahmoud Mandour, Pierrick Bouvier, qemu-devel,
	deller

Hi Alex,

Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> writes:

> Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org> writes:
> I think we've lost a patch in the re-posting. patchew hasn't seen it
> either:
>
>   https://patchew.org/QEMU/20240229150729.1620410-1-svens@stackframe.org/
>
>>   plugins/execlog: add data address match
>>   plugins/execlog: add address range matching
>>
>>  contrib/plugins/execlog.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Yes, i got a 550 mail. But i'll look into the qemu_set_dfilter_ranges()
before resending.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-29 19:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-29 15:07 [PATCH 0/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match and address range support Sven Schnelle
2024-02-29 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match Sven Schnelle
2024-02-29 15:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] plugins/execlog: add address range matching Sven Schnelle
2024-02-29 17:12   ` Alex Bennée
2024-02-29 18:04     ` Sven Schnelle
2024-02-29 17:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] plugins/execlog: add data address match and address range support Alex Bennée
2024-02-29 19:40   ` Sven Schnelle

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.