All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>,
	 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	 davem@davemloft.net,  edumazet@google.com,  kuba@kernel.org,
	 pabeni@redhat.com,  dsahern@kernel.org,  xeb@mail.ru,
	 shuah@kernel.org,  idosch@nvidia.com,  amcohen@nvidia.com,
	 petrm@nvidia.com,  jbenc@redhat.com,  bpoirier@nvidia.com,
	 b.galvani@gmail.com,  liujian56@huawei.com,  horms@kernel.org,
	 linyunsheng@huawei.com,  therbert@google.com,
	 netdev@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] net: gro: move L3 flush checks to tcp_gro_receive
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:40:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6602d05046526_13d9ab29498@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <494e8cac-e87a-4bc4-8a77-1801a703fd86@gmail.com>

Richard Gobert wrote:
> Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > In v3 we discussed how the flush on network layer differences (like
> > TTL or ToS) currently only affect the TCP GRO path, but should apply
> > more broadly.
> > 
> > We agreed that it is fine to leave that to a separate patch series.
> > 
> > But seeing this patch, it introduces a lot of churn, but also makes
> > it harder to address that issue for UDP, as it now moves network
> > layer checks directly to the TCP code.
> Currently the logic of flush_id is scattered in tcp_gro_receive and
> {inet,ipv6}_gro_receive with conditionals rewriting ->flush and ->flush_id,
> so IMO the code should be more concise when it's in one place - in addition
> to not doing checks against non relevant packets.
> 
> With this patch, the fix will probably be simple, most likely just calling
> gro_network_flush from skb_gro_receive or from the relevant flow in
> udp_gro_receive_segment. Since this bug fix should be simple and it being
> not relevant to the optimization, I'd like to solve it in another series
> and properly test that new flow. Do you agree?

My main concern is moving this code to tcp_offload.c, if it likely
soon will be moved elsewhere again.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-26 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-25 18:25 [PATCH net-next v4 0/4] net: gro: encapsulation bug fix and flush checks improvements Richard Gobert
2024-03-25 18:25 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] net: gro: add p_off param in *_gro_complete Richard Gobert
2024-03-25 18:25 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/4] selftests/net: add local address bind in vxlan selftest Richard Gobert
2024-03-25 18:25 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: gro: add {inner_}network_offset to napi_gro_cb Richard Gobert
2024-03-25 18:25 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] net: gro: move L3 flush checks to tcp_gro_receive Richard Gobert
2024-03-25 18:53   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-26 12:35     ` Richard Gobert
2024-03-26 13:40       ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2024-03-26 14:09         ` Richard Gobert
2024-03-26  2:33   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-26 14:14   ` Eric Dumazet
2024-03-26 14:43     ` Richard Gobert
2024-03-26 14:46       ` Eric Dumazet
2024-03-26 15:02         ` Richard Gobert
2024-03-26 15:10           ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-26 15:26             ` Richard Gobert
2024-03-26 16:14           ` Paolo Abeni
2024-03-26 17:25             ` Richard Gobert
2024-03-26 18:29               ` Paolo Abeni
2024-03-27 16:07                 ` Richard Gobert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6602d05046526_13d9ab29498@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=amcohen@nvidia.com \
    --cc=b.galvani@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpoirier@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=liujian56@huawei.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=richardbgobert@gmail.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    --cc=xeb@mail.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.