* Re: [Testing] Testing Reiser4 with xfstests
[not found] <CADW=+3nVaodqG2YX0g8kajU=ZPKOPw167Sm98vHQBFvmqfL4xg@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2014-12-05 13:46 ` Dušan Čolić
2014-12-06 10:07 ` Dušan Čolić
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dušan Čolić @ 2014-12-05 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Edward Shishkin, Ivan Shapovalov, reiserfs-devel
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Dušan Čolić <dusanc@gmail.com> wrote:
> I managed to get xfstests (
> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/cmds/xfstests.git;a=tree ) to
> run on Reiser4 partition. Test for async, acl, quota still don't work but a
> lot of the rest finishes successfully.
> Tests were run on reiser4-for-3.16.2.patch
> I'll post unsuccessful tests and their results in following e-mails.
>
Btw. these tests can stress test fs and I could also test with
different mount (block size?) or mkfs options (reg40) and automate it
easily to test multiple combinations, so if there's any ideas what
would be useful please tell me.
Thanks
Dushan
> Dushan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Testing] Testing Reiser4 with xfstests
2014-12-05 13:46 ` [Testing] Testing Reiser4 with xfstests Dušan Čolić
@ 2014-12-06 10:07 ` Dušan Čolić
2014-12-06 12:02 ` Edward Shishkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dušan Čolić @ 2014-12-06 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Edward Shishkin, Ivan Shapovalov, reiserfs-devel
Some of the tests (~20 of 300) didn't work and I traced that they
require fallocate. AFAIK R4 doesn't support it right?
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Dušan Čolić <dusanc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Dušan Čolić <dusanc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I managed to get xfstests (
>> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/cmds/xfstests.git;a=tree ) to
>> run on Reiser4 partition. Test for async, acl, quota still don't work but a
>> lot of the rest finishes successfully.
>> Tests were run on reiser4-for-3.16.2.patch
>> I'll post unsuccessful tests and their results in following e-mails.
>>
> Btw. these tests can stress test fs and I could also test with
> different mount (block size?) or mkfs options (reg40) and automate it
> easily to test multiple combinations, so if there's any ideas what
> would be useful please tell me.
>
> Thanks
> Dushan
>
>
>> Dushan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Testing] Testing Reiser4 with xfstests
2014-12-06 10:07 ` Dušan Čolić
@ 2014-12-06 12:02 ` Edward Shishkin
2014-12-07 8:28 ` Dušan Čolić
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Edward Shishkin @ 2014-12-06 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Dušan Čolić, Ivan Shapovalov, reiserfs-devel
On 12/06/2014 11:07 AM, Dušan Čolić wrote:
> Some of the tests (~20 of 300) didn't work and I traced that they
> require fallocate. AFAIK R4 doesn't support it right?
Yup, we don't support fallocate.
Edward.
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Dušan Čolić <dusanc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Dušan Čolić <dusanc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I managed to get xfstests (
>>> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/cmds/xfstests.git;a=tree ) to
>>> run on Reiser4 partition. Test for async, acl, quota still don't work but a
>>> lot of the rest finishes successfully.
>>> Tests were run on reiser4-for-3.16.2.patch
>>> I'll post unsuccessful tests and their results in following e-mails.
>>>
>> Btw. these tests can stress test fs and I could also test with
>> different mount (block size?) or mkfs options (reg40) and automate it
>> easily to test multiple combinations, so if there's any ideas what
>> would be useful please tell me.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Dushan
>>
>>
>>> Dushan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Testing] Testing Reiser4 with xfstests
2014-12-06 12:02 ` Edward Shishkin
@ 2014-12-07 8:28 ` Dušan Čolić
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dušan Čolić @ 2014-12-07 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Edward Shishkin; +Cc: Ivan Shapovalov, reiserfs-devel
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Edward Shishkin
<edward.shishkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/06/2014 11:07 AM, Dušan Čolić wrote:
>>
>> Some of the tests (~20 of 300) didn't work and I traced that they
>> require fallocate. AFAIK R4 doesn't support it right?
>
>
>
> Yup, we don't support fallocate.
>
> Edward.
>
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Dušan Čolić <dusanc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Dušan Čolić <dusanc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I managed to get xfstests (
>>>> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/cmds/xfstests.git;a=tree )
>>>> to
>>>> run on Reiser4 partition. Test for async, acl, quota still don't work
>>>> but a
>>>> lot of the rest finishes successfully.
>>>> Tests were run on reiser4-for-3.16.2.patch
>>>> I'll post unsuccessful tests and their results in following e-mails.
>>>>
>>> Btw. these tests can stress test fs and I could also test with
>>> different mount (block size?) or mkfs options (reg40) and automate it
>>> easily to test multiple combinations, so if there's any ideas what
>>> would be useful please tell me.
>>>
All combinations I test fail same tests:
generic/091 fsx exercising direct IO -- sub-block sizes and concurrent
buffered IO
generic/130 SQA Test No. 130
xfs_io vector read/write and trunc tests. modified from cxfsqa tests
- unixfile_basic_block_hole
- unixfile_buffer_direct_
coherency
- unixfile_direct_rw
- unixfile_eof_direct
- unixfile_fsb_edge
- unixfile_open_append
- unixfile_open_trunc
- unixfile_small_vector_async_rw
- unixfile_small_vector_sync_rw
generic/135 Concurrent I/O to same file to ensure no deadlocks
generic/263 fsx exercising direct IO vs sub-block buffered I/O
I'm currently testing these combinations (only ccreg40 as reg40 is
stuck in D state in the middle of the tests):
[r4ccHybrid]
MODULAR=0
TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch
TEST_DEV=/dev/hda5
SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/hda7
RESULT_BASE="`pwd`/results/`date +%d%m%y_%H%M%S`"
RECREATE_TEST_DEV="true"
FSTYP=reiser4
MKFS_OPTIONS=" "
MOUNT_OPTIONS=" "
[r4ccNoatime]
MKFS_OPTIONS=" "
MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o noatime"
[r4ccCOW]
MKFS_OPTIONS=" "
MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o txmod=wa"
[r4ccJournal]
MKFS_OPTIONS=" "
MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o txmod=journal"
[r4ccLexic]
MKFS_OPTIONS="-o fibration=lexic_fibre"
MOUNT_OPTIONS=" "
[r4ccDot_o]
MKFS_OPTIONS="-o fibration=dot_o_fibre"
MOUNT_OPTIONS=" "
[r4ccExt_1]
MKFS_OPTIONS="-o fibration=ext_1_fibre"
MOUNT_OPTIONS=" "
[r4ccExt_3]
MKFS_OPTIONS="-o fibration=ext_3_fibre"
MOUNT_OPTIONS=" "
[r4ccTails]
MKFS_OPTIONS="-o formatting=tails"
MOUNT_OPTIONS=" "
[r4ccExtents]
MKFS_OPTIONS="-o formatting=extents"
MOUNT_OPTIONS=" "
>>> Thanks
>>> Dushan
>>>
>>>
>>>> Dushan
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-07 8:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CADW=+3nVaodqG2YX0g8kajU=ZPKOPw167Sm98vHQBFvmqfL4xg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-12-05 13:46 ` [Testing] Testing Reiser4 with xfstests Dušan Čolić
2014-12-06 10:07 ` Dušan Čolić
2014-12-06 12:02 ` Edward Shishkin
2014-12-07 8:28 ` Dušan Čolić
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.