From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9D2C48BE5 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 19:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA555600D4 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 19:34:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CA555600D4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=eik.bme.hu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:57402 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ls9ON-0005zG-Ib for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 15:34:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51578) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ls9Nh-0005Kd-UG; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 15:33:21 -0400 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu ([2001:738:2001:2001::2001]:59534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ls9Nd-0006OD-Tt; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 15:33:21 -0400 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu (blah.eik.bme.hu [152.66.115.182]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D98497462DB; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 21:33:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix, from userid 432) id BE5F27457E7; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 21:33:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBDD745708; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 21:33:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 21:33:09 +0200 (CEST) From: BALATON Zoltan To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=E9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] i2c: Match parameters of i2c_start_transfer and i2c_send_recv In-Reply-To: <20200623063123.20776-1-f4bug@amsat.org> Message-ID: <46692025-50b-2734-e394-513b2761b979@eik.bme.hu> References: <20200623063123.20776-1-f4bug@amsat.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="3866299591-113163332-1623525915=:45517" Content-ID: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:738:2001:2001::2001; envelope-from=balaton@eik.bme.hu; helo=zero.eik.bme.hu X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Corey Minyard , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --3866299591-113163332-1623525915=:45517 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-ID: Hello, On Tue, 23 Jun 2020, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > This is v2 of Zoltan's patch: > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg714711.html > > - rebased > - added docstring > - include hw/misc/auxbus.c fix > > Supersedes: <20200621145235.9E241745712@zero.eik.bme.hu> What happened to this series? I did not find it in patchew, only my original patch: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200621145235.9E241745712@zero.eik.bme.hu/ I still have this in one of my branches so I think it was not merged at the end. Could this be resurrected or should I forget about it and live with the inconsistency in parameters instead? Regards, BALATON Zoltan > BALATON Zoltan (2): > i2c: Match parameters of i2c_start_transfer and i2c_send_recv > i2c: Make i2c_start_transfer() direction argument a boolean > > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (1): > hw/misc/auxbus: Fix MOT/classic I2C mode > > include/hw/i2c/i2c.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- > hw/display/sm501.c | 4 ++-- > hw/i2c/core.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ > hw/i2c/ppc4xx_i2c.c | 2 +- > hw/misc/auxbus.c | 10 +++++----- > 5 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > --3866299591-113163332-1623525915=:45517--