All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>
To: Eric Ding <ericding@applix.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: ld bug with -Bsymbolic --noinhibit-exec (2.9.1.0.990418-1c)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:31:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4.2.0.56.19990621112016.009bd720@mail.lauterbach.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199906181954.PAA01284@tuxedo.applix.com>


At 21:54 18.06.99 , Eric Ding wrote:
>Hi Franz,
>
>thanks for your help so far.  After upgrading to 1b, linking works, but
>actually running against those shared libraries doesn't seem to
>necessarily work.  But it's hard for me to tell where the bug is.

If you still have problems after upgrading to 2.9.4.0.6 below, I'm willing 
to look further into it, but I assume it will be difficult, as you don't 
know the exact cause yourself. Can we rule out bugs in your source here? 
Did the executables created with 2.9.4.0.5 on x86 work fine? I'll also post 
my patch for the noinhibit-exec problem on the binutils-list for review 
later today.

>The fact that LD_RUN_PATH needed to be set is still a red flag in my
>mind... is that "correct" behavior?  I know that Applixware linked and
>ran OK with binutils from R4; would backtracking be an adequate
>solution?

Ok, the LD_RUN_PATH should be fixed now with:

ftp://dev.linuxppc.org/users/fsirl/R5/RPMS/ppc/binutils-2.9.4.0.6-1a.ppc.rpm

Franz.


[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list.  Replies are ]]
[[ not  forced  back  to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting.   ]]

  reply	other threads:[~1999-06-21  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-06-16 16:29 ld bug with -Bsymbolic --noinhibit-exec (2.9.1.0.990418-1c) Eric Ding
1999-06-16 17:21 ` Franz Sirl
1999-06-16 18:09   ` Eric Ding
1999-06-16 18:31     ` Franz Sirl
1999-06-16 19:38       ` Eric Ding
1999-06-16 20:40         ` Franz Sirl
1999-06-16 21:14           ` Eric Ding
1999-06-17 21:24             ` Franz Sirl
1999-06-17 22:49               ` Eric Ding
1999-06-18 19:54               ` Eric Ding
1999-06-21  9:31                 ` Franz Sirl [this message]
1999-06-21 13:05                   ` Franz Sirl
1999-06-21 19:44                     ` Eric Ding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4.2.0.56.19990621112016.009bd720@mail.lauterbach.com \
    --to=franz.sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com \
    --cc=ericding@applix.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.