All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use
@ 2002-12-20  8:43 george anzinger
  2002-12-20 10:26 ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: george anzinger @ 2002-12-20  8:43 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 901 bytes --]

On SMP systems the timer list init is done by way of a
cpu_notifier call.  This has two problems:

1.) Timers are started WAY before the cpu_notifier call
chain is executed.  In particular the console blanking timer
is deleted and inserted every time printk() is called.  That
this does not fail is only because the kernel has yet to
protect location zero.

2.) This notifier is called when a cpu comes up.  I suspect
that initializing the timer list when a hot swap of a cpu is
done is NOT the right thing to do.  In any case, if this is
a desired action, the list still needs to be initialized
prior to its use.

The attached patch initializes all the timer lists at
init_timers time and does not put code in the notify list.
--
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml

[-- Attachment #2: timer-init-fix.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1027 bytes --]

--- linux-2.5.52-bk4-org/kernel/timer.c~	Thu Dec 19 12:13:18 2002
+++ linux/kernel/timer.c	Fri Dec 20 00:38:15 2002
@@ -1150,7 +1150,7 @@
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void __devinit init_timers_cpu(int cpu)
+static void __init init_timers_cpu(int cpu)
 {
 	int j;
 	tvec_base_t *base;
@@ -1167,29 +1167,12 @@
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(base->tv1.vec + j);
 }
 	
-static int __devinit timer_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self, 
-				unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
-{
-	long cpu = (long)hcpu;
-	switch(action) {
-	case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
-		init_timers_cpu(cpu);
-		break;
-	default:
-		break;
-	}
-	return NOTIFY_OK;
-}
-
-static struct notifier_block __devinitdata timers_nb = {
-	.notifier_call	= timer_cpu_notify,
-};
-
 
 void __init init_timers(void)
 {
-	timer_cpu_notify(&timers_nb, (unsigned long)CPU_UP_PREPARE,
-				(void *)(long)smp_processor_id());
-	register_cpu_notifier(&timers_nb);
+	int cpu;
+	for (cpu = 0; cpu < NR_CPUS; cpu++){
+		init_timers_cpu(cpu);
+	}
 	open_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ, run_timer_softirq, NULL);
 }


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use
  2002-12-20  8:43 [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use george anzinger
@ 2002-12-20 10:26 ` Andrew Morton
  2002-12-20 17:18   ` george anzinger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2002-12-20 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: george anzinger; +Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds

george anzinger wrote:
> 
> On SMP systems the timer list init is done by way of a
> cpu_notifier call.  This has two problems:
> 
> 1.) Timers are started WAY before the cpu_notifier call
> chain is executed.  In particular the console blanking timer
> is deleted and inserted every time printk() is called.  That
> this does not fail is only because the kernel has yet to
> protect location zero.

But init_timers() directly calls timer_cpu_notify(), which directly
calls init_timers_cpu().

So your patch appears to be a no-op for the boot CPU.
 
> 2.) This notifier is called when a cpu comes up.  I suspect
> that initializing the timer list when a hot swap of a cpu is
> done is NOT the right thing to do.  In any case, if this is
> a desired action, the list still needs to be initialized
> prior to its use.

It should be OK as-is?  The CPU_UP_PREPARE callout is performed
before the secondary starts doing things.  Its timers are initialised.
 
> The attached patch initializes all the timer lists at
> init_timers time and does not put code in the notify list.

But the patch assumes that the per-cpu data exists for all CPUs - even
the !cpu_possible() ones.

This is true at present.  But the intent here is that the per-cpu
storage be allocated as the CPUs come up, and in their node-local
memory.  That saves memory and presumably having the cpu-local timers
in the cpu-local memory is a good thing.

I have working code which did all that, but it sort-of got lost
because there was a lot going on at the time.


Have you actually observed any problem?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use
  2002-12-20 10:26 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2002-12-20 17:18   ` george anzinger
  2002-12-20 19:34     ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: george anzinger @ 2002-12-20 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds

Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> george anzinger wrote:
> >
> > On SMP systems the timer list init is done by way of a
> > cpu_notifier call.  This has two problems:
> >
> > 1.) Timers are started WAY before the cpu_notifier call
> > chain is executed.  In particular the console blanking timer
> > is deleted and inserted every time printk() is called.  That
> > this does not fail is only because the kernel has yet to
> > protect location zero.
> 
> But init_timers() directly calls timer_cpu_notify(), which directly
> calls init_timers_cpu().
> 
> So your patch appears to be a no-op for the boot CPU.

That is correct.  The problem is when cpu_init is called for
the secondary cpus.  It almost immediately calls printk. 
You can put a break point here, wait for the second entry
and then in mod_timer.  You will see that mod_timer grabs
the "base" for the second cpu which is not initialized. 
> 
> > 2.) This notifier is called when a cpu comes up.  I suspect
> > that initializing the timer list when a hot swap of a cpu is
> > done is NOT the right thing to do.  In any case, if this is
> > a desired action, the list still needs to be initialized
> > prior to its use.
> 
> It should be OK as-is?  The CPU_UP_PREPARE callout is performed
> before the secondary starts doing things.  Its timers are initialised.

Yes, but not really.  As noted, the timers are called as a
result of printk. (I use a standard pc for this so the
console is on the standard pc tube.  I don't know about
other consoles...)  My comments here are a wonderment if
this is the right thing to do when doing a hot swap of the
cpu.  I sort of doubt that this is correct.
> 
> > The attached patch initializes all the timer lists at
> > init_timers time and does not put code in the notify list.
> 
> But the patch assumes that the per-cpu data exists for all CPUs - even
> the !cpu_possible() ones.

True.
> 
> This is true at present.  But the intent here is that the per-cpu
> storage be allocated as the CPUs come up, and in their node-local
> memory.  That saves memory and presumably having the cpu-local timers
> in the cpu-local memory is a good thing.
> 
I agree.  It is possible that we may want to hold off
printks until the cpu is up.  There is a stub to do this,
but it is a nop on the i386.

> I have working code which did all that, but it sort-of got lost
> because there was a lot going on at the time.
> 
> Have you actually observed any problem?

Yes, with my High-res-timers patch (all 4 of them) with
CONFIG_HIGH_RES turned off fails to boot.  I traced the
timer insert as I suggested above and it somehow gets away
with writing into *NULL.  I am not sure how this happens,
but when I ask KGDB to read it back, it also is able to read
it.  The inserted timer (this is on an unpatched system,
i.e. no high-res or anything but the kgdb patch) looks like
this:
(gdb) p *timer
$13 = {entry = {next = 0xc11455b8, prev = 0x0}, expires =
605082, lock = {
    lock = 1}, magic = 1267182958, function = 0xc01d8510
<blank_screen>, 
  data = 0, base = 0x0}

The base of 0 is ok as that is updated after the insert by
mod_timer.  The prev =0, however is not cool.

-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use
  2002-12-20 17:18   ` george anzinger
@ 2002-12-20 19:34     ` Andrew Morton
  2002-12-20 20:01       ` george anzinger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2002-12-20 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: george anzinger; +Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds

george anzinger wrote:
> 
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > george anzinger wrote:
> > >
> > > On SMP systems the timer list init is done by way of a
> > > cpu_notifier call.  This has two problems:
> > >
> > > 1.) Timers are started WAY before the cpu_notifier call
> > > chain is executed.  In particular the console blanking timer
> > > is deleted and inserted every time printk() is called.  That
> > > this does not fail is only because the kernel has yet to
> > > protect location zero.
> >
> > But init_timers() directly calls timer_cpu_notify(), which directly
> > calls init_timers_cpu().
> >
> > So your patch appears to be a no-op for the boot CPU.
> 
> That is correct.  The problem is when cpu_init is called for
> the secondary cpus.  It almost immediately calls printk.

OK.  So until that CPU sees it bit come on in smp_commenced_mask()
it's not allowed to assume that it is running yet.

> ...
> My comments here are a wonderment if
> this is the right thing to do when doing a hot swap of the
> cpu.  I sort of doubt that this is correct.

I agree.  And from a quick read it does seem that ia32 is
doing the right thing apart from calling printk.

I don't think we should make changes to the timer code because
who knows what assumptions other console drivers could be making?

I don't think we should carefully remove all printk() calls because
printk() is supposed to be robust, and always callable.

The logical thing is to implement arch_consoles_callable().  Does
this look workable?



--- 25/kernel/printk.c~ga	Fri Dec 20 11:32:05 2002
+++ 25-akpm/kernel/printk.c	Fri Dec 20 11:33:14 2002
@@ -43,7 +43,11 @@
 #define LOG_BUF_MASK	(LOG_BUF_LEN-1)
 
 #ifndef arch_consoles_callable
-#define arch_consoles_callable() (1)
+/*
+ * Some console drivers may assume that per-cpu resources have been allocated.
+ * So don't allow them to be called by this CPU until it is officially up.
+ */
+#define arch_consoles_callable() cpu_online(smp_processor_id())
 #endif
 
 /* printk's without a loglevel use this.. */

_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use
  2002-12-20 19:34     ` Andrew Morton
@ 2002-12-20 20:01       ` george anzinger
  2002-12-20 20:31         ` Andrew Morton
  2002-12-22  8:38         ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: george anzinger @ 2002-12-20 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds

Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> george anzinger wrote:
> >
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > george anzinger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On SMP systems the timer list init is done by way of a
> > > > cpu_notifier call.  This has two problems:
> > > >
> > > > 1.) Timers are started WAY before the cpu_notifier call
> > > > chain is executed.  In particular the console blanking timer
> > > > is deleted and inserted every time printk() is called.  That
> > > > this does not fail is only because the kernel has yet to
> > > > protect location zero.
> > >
> > > But init_timers() directly calls timer_cpu_notify(), which directly
> > > calls init_timers_cpu().
> > >
> > > So your patch appears to be a no-op for the boot CPU.
> >
> > That is correct.  The problem is when cpu_init is called for
> > the secondary cpus.  It almost immediately calls printk.
> 
> OK.  So until that CPU sees it bit come on in smp_commenced_mask()
> it's not allowed to assume that it is running yet.
> 
> > ...
> > My comments here are a wonderment if
> > this is the right thing to do when doing a hot swap of the
> > cpu.  I sort of doubt that this is correct.
> 
> I agree.  And from a quick read it does seem that ia32 is
> doing the right thing apart from calling printk.
> 
> I don't think we should make changes to the timer code because
> who knows what assumptions other console drivers could be making?
> 
> I don't think we should carefully remove all printk() calls because
> printk() is supposed to be robust, and always callable.
> 
> The logical thing is to implement arch_consoles_callable().  Does
> this look workable?

I am not sure.  The first question is when does the online
bit get set for cpu 0.  The next is that it does inhibit a
rather large block of printks.  Is this ok?

Mind you, I have not tried it yet...

-g
> 
> --- 25/kernel/printk.c~ga       Fri Dec 20 11:32:05 2002
> +++ 25-akpm/kernel/printk.c     Fri Dec 20 11:33:14 2002
> @@ -43,7 +43,11 @@
>  #define LOG_BUF_MASK   (LOG_BUF_LEN-1)
> 
>  #ifndef arch_consoles_callable
> -#define arch_consoles_callable() (1)
> +/*
> + * Some console drivers may assume that per-cpu resources have been allocated.
> + * So don't allow them to be called by this CPU until it is officially up.
> + */
> +#define arch_consoles_callable() cpu_online(smp_processor_id())
>  #endif
> 
>  /* printk's without a loglevel use this.. */
> 

-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use
  2002-12-20 20:01       ` george anzinger
@ 2002-12-20 20:31         ` Andrew Morton
  2002-12-22  8:38         ` Andrew Morton
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2002-12-20 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: george anzinger; +Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds

george anzinger wrote:
> 
> ...
> > The logical thing is to implement arch_consoles_callable().  Does
> > this look workable?
> 
> I am not sure.  The first question is when does the online
> bit get set for cpu 0.

Too late, probably.  We might need an escape clause for the boot
CPU there.

>  The next is that it does inhibit a
> rather large block of printks.  Is this ok?

They get buffered, so the info will come out eventually.  But we do want
it to come out in a timely manner.
 
> Mind you, I have not tried it yet...

I think it's the right approach.  I can take poke at it if you like.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use
  2002-12-20 20:01       ` george anzinger
  2002-12-20 20:31         ` Andrew Morton
@ 2002-12-22  8:38         ` Andrew Morton
  2002-12-22  9:58           ` george anzinger
  2002-12-22 21:14           ` Martin J. Bligh
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2002-12-22  8:38 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: george anzinger, Martin J. Bligh
  Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell

george anzinger wrote:
> 
> ...
> I am not sure.  The first question is when does the online
> bit get set for cpu 0.  The next is that it does inhibit a
> rather large block of printks.  Is this ok?
> 

The boot cpu is set online extremely late.  Strangely late.  Why
is this?

How about something like the below?  We mark the boot cpu 
online in generic code as soon as it has initialised its per-cpu
storage (seems appropriate?)

This will then allow that cpu to actually start calling into console
drivers, if they have been registered.  If those drivers do a mod_timer()
(as the vga console does) then that will work OK.

Secondary CPUs also are not marked online until their per-cpu storage is
initialised, and their notifiers have been called.

If a non-online cpu calls printk, its output will be buffered.  It will
be displayed by the next call to printk by an online CPU.


(The patch needs set_cpu_online()/set_cpu_possible() implementations
done for the other architectures)



 arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c |    5 -----
 include/asm-i386/smp.h     |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
 include/linux/smp.h        |    7 ++++++-
 init/main.c                |    8 ++++++++
 kernel/printk.c            |    6 +++++-
 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- 25/kernel/printk.c~ga	Sat Dec 21 23:27:08 2002
+++ 25-akpm/kernel/printk.c	Sat Dec 21 23:27:08 2002
@@ -43,7 +43,11 @@
 #define LOG_BUF_MASK	(LOG_BUF_LEN-1)
 
 #ifndef arch_consoles_callable
-#define arch_consoles_callable() (1)
+/*
+ * Some console drivers may assume that per-cpu resources have been allocated.
+ * So don't allow them to be called by this CPU until it is officially up.
+ */
+#define arch_consoles_callable() cpu_online(smp_processor_id())
 #endif
 
 /* printk's without a loglevel use this.. */
--- 25/init/main.c~ga	Sat Dec 21 23:48:03 2002
+++ 25-akpm/init/main.c	Sat Dec 21 23:55:00 2002
@@ -361,6 +361,14 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
 	printk(linux_banner);
 	setup_arch(&command_line);
 	setup_per_cpu_areas();
+
+	/*
+	 * Once the boot CPU's per-cpu memory is set up it may be considered
+	 * online.  This is mainly to turn on printk output.
+	 */
+	set_cpu_online(smp_processor_id());
+	set_cpu_possible(smp_processor_id());
+
 	build_all_zonelists();
 	page_alloc_init();
 	printk("Kernel command line: %s\n", saved_command_line);
--- 25/include/asm-i386/smp.h~ga	Sat Dec 21 23:49:43 2002
+++ 25-akpm/include/asm-i386/smp.h	Sat Dec 21 23:54:16 2002
@@ -80,15 +80,32 @@ extern volatile int logical_apicid_to_cp
 
 extern volatile unsigned long cpu_callout_map;
 
-#define cpu_possible(cpu) (cpu_callout_map & (1<<(cpu)))
-#define cpu_online(cpu) (cpu_online_map & (1<<(cpu)))
+static inline int cpu_possible(int cpu)
+{
+	return cpu_callout_map & (1 << cpu);
+}
+
+static inline void set_cpu_possible(int cpu)
+{
+	cpu_callout_map |= (1 << cpu);
+}
+
+static inline int cpu_online(int cpu)
+{
+	return cpu_online_map & (1 << cpu);
+}
+
+static inline void set_cpu_online(int cpu)
+{
+	cpu_online_map |= (1 << cpu);
+}
 
-extern inline unsigned int num_online_cpus(void)
+static inline unsigned int num_online_cpus(void)
 {
 	return hweight32(cpu_online_map);
 }
 
-extern inline int any_online_cpu(unsigned int mask)
+static inline int any_online_cpu(unsigned int mask)
 {
 	if (mask & cpu_online_map)
 		return __ffs(mask & cpu_online_map);
@@ -96,13 +113,13 @@ extern inline int any_online_cpu(unsigne
 	return -1;
 }
 
-static __inline int hard_smp_processor_id(void)
+static inline int hard_smp_processor_id(void)
 {
 	/* we don't want to mark this access volatile - bad code generation */
 	return GET_APIC_ID(*(unsigned long *)(APIC_BASE+APIC_ID));
 }
 
-static __inline int logical_smp_processor_id(void)
+static inline int logical_smp_processor_id(void)
 {
 	/* we don't want to mark this access volatile - bad code generation */
 	return GET_APIC_LOGICAL_ID(*(unsigned long *)(APIC_BASE+APIC_LDR));
--- 25/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c~ga	Sat Dec 21 23:52:51 2002
+++ 25-akpm/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c	Sat Dec 21 23:54:43 2002
@@ -992,11 +992,6 @@ static void __init smp_boot_cpus(unsigne
 	printk("CPU%d: ", 0);
 	print_cpu_info(&cpu_data[0]);
 
-	/*
-	 * We have the boot CPU online for sure.
-	 */
-	set_bit(0, &cpu_online_map);
-	set_bit(0, &cpu_callout_map);
 	boot_cpu_logical_apicid = logical_smp_processor_id();
 	map_cpu_to_boot_apicid(0, boot_cpu_apicid);
 
--- 25/include/linux/smp.h~ga	Sun Dec 22 00:29:05 2002
+++ 25-akpm/include/linux/smp.h	Sun Dec 22 00:30:15 2002
@@ -94,7 +94,12 @@ static inline void smp_send_reschedule_a
 #define cpu_online(cpu)				({ BUG_ON((cpu) != 0); 1; })
 #define num_online_cpus()			1
 #define num_booting_cpus()			1
-#define cpu_possible(cpu)				({ BUG_ON((cpu) != 0); 1; })
+#define cpu_possible(cpu)			({ BUG_ON((cpu) != 0); 1; })
+static inline void set_cpu_online(int cpu)
+{}
+static inline void set_cpu_possible(int cpu)
+{}
+
 
 struct notifier_block;
 

_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use
  2002-12-22  8:38         ` Andrew Morton
@ 2002-12-22  9:58           ` george anzinger
  2002-12-22 21:14           ` Martin J. Bligh
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: george anzinger @ 2002-12-22  9:58 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Andrew Morton
  Cc: Martin J. Bligh, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell

Looks ok.  I will give it a spin on Monday.

-g

Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> george anzinger wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > I am not sure.  The first question is when does the online
> > bit get set for cpu 0.  The next is that it does inhibit a
> > rather large block of printks.  Is this ok?
> >
> 
> The boot cpu is set online extremely late.  Strangely late.  Why
> is this?
> 
> How about something like the below?  We mark the boot cpu
> online in generic code as soon as it has initialised its per-cpu
> storage (seems appropriate?)
> 
> This will then allow that cpu to actually start calling into console
> drivers, if they have been registered.  If those drivers do a mod_timer()
> (as the vga console does) then that will work OK.
> 
> Secondary CPUs also are not marked online until their per-cpu storage is
> initialised, and their notifiers have been called.
> 
> If a non-online cpu calls printk, its output will be buffered.  It will
> be displayed by the next call to printk by an online CPU.
> 
> (The patch needs set_cpu_online()/set_cpu_possible() implementations
> done for the other architectures)
> 
>  arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c |    5 -----
>  include/asm-i386/smp.h     |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  include/linux/smp.h        |    7 ++++++-
>  init/main.c                |    8 ++++++++
>  kernel/printk.c            |    6 +++++-
>  5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> --- 25/kernel/printk.c~ga       Sat Dec 21 23:27:08 2002
> +++ 25-akpm/kernel/printk.c     Sat Dec 21 23:27:08 2002
> @@ -43,7 +43,11 @@
>  #define LOG_BUF_MASK   (LOG_BUF_LEN-1)
> 
>  #ifndef arch_consoles_callable
> -#define arch_consoles_callable() (1)
> +/*
> + * Some console drivers may assume that per-cpu resources have been allocated.
> + * So don't allow them to be called by this CPU until it is officially up.
> + */
> +#define arch_consoles_callable() cpu_online(smp_processor_id())
>  #endif
> 
>  /* printk's without a loglevel use this.. */
> --- 25/init/main.c~ga   Sat Dec 21 23:48:03 2002
> +++ 25-akpm/init/main.c Sat Dec 21 23:55:00 2002
> @@ -361,6 +361,14 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
>         printk(linux_banner);
>         setup_arch(&command_line);
>         setup_per_cpu_areas();
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Once the boot CPU's per-cpu memory is set up it may be considered
> +        * online.  This is mainly to turn on printk output.
> +        */
> +       set_cpu_online(smp_processor_id());
> +       set_cpu_possible(smp_processor_id());
> +
>         build_all_zonelists();
>         page_alloc_init();
>         printk("Kernel command line: %s\n", saved_command_line);
> --- 25/include/asm-i386/smp.h~ga        Sat Dec 21 23:49:43 2002
> +++ 25-akpm/include/asm-i386/smp.h      Sat Dec 21 23:54:16 2002
> @@ -80,15 +80,32 @@ extern volatile int logical_apicid_to_cp
> 
>  extern volatile unsigned long cpu_callout_map;
> 
> -#define cpu_possible(cpu) (cpu_callout_map & (1<<(cpu)))
> -#define cpu_online(cpu) (cpu_online_map & (1<<(cpu)))
> +static inline int cpu_possible(int cpu)
> +{
> +       return cpu_callout_map & (1 << cpu);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void set_cpu_possible(int cpu)
> +{
> +       cpu_callout_map |= (1 << cpu);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int cpu_online(int cpu)
> +{
> +       return cpu_online_map & (1 << cpu);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void set_cpu_online(int cpu)
> +{
> +       cpu_online_map |= (1 << cpu);
> +}
> 
> -extern inline unsigned int num_online_cpus(void)
> +static inline unsigned int num_online_cpus(void)
>  {
>         return hweight32(cpu_online_map);
>  }
> 
> -extern inline int any_online_cpu(unsigned int mask)
> +static inline int any_online_cpu(unsigned int mask)
>  {
>         if (mask & cpu_online_map)
>                 return __ffs(mask & cpu_online_map);
> @@ -96,13 +113,13 @@ extern inline int any_online_cpu(unsigne
>         return -1;
>  }
> 
> -static __inline int hard_smp_processor_id(void)
> +static inline int hard_smp_processor_id(void)
>  {
>         /* we don't want to mark this access volatile - bad code generation */
>         return GET_APIC_ID(*(unsigned long *)(APIC_BASE+APIC_ID));
>  }
> 
> -static __inline int logical_smp_processor_id(void)
> +static inline int logical_smp_processor_id(void)
>  {
>         /* we don't want to mark this access volatile - bad code generation */
>         return GET_APIC_LOGICAL_ID(*(unsigned long *)(APIC_BASE+APIC_LDR));
> --- 25/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c~ga    Sat Dec 21 23:52:51 2002
> +++ 25-akpm/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c  Sat Dec 21 23:54:43 2002
> @@ -992,11 +992,6 @@ static void __init smp_boot_cpus(unsigne
>         printk("CPU%d: ", 0);
>         print_cpu_info(&cpu_data[0]);
> 
> -       /*
> -        * We have the boot CPU online for sure.
> -        */
> -       set_bit(0, &cpu_online_map);
> -       set_bit(0, &cpu_callout_map);
>         boot_cpu_logical_apicid = logical_smp_processor_id();
>         map_cpu_to_boot_apicid(0, boot_cpu_apicid);
> 
> --- 25/include/linux/smp.h~ga   Sun Dec 22 00:29:05 2002
> +++ 25-akpm/include/linux/smp.h Sun Dec 22 00:30:15 2002
> @@ -94,7 +94,12 @@ static inline void smp_send_reschedule_a
>  #define cpu_online(cpu)                                ({ BUG_ON((cpu) != 0); 1; })
>  #define num_online_cpus()                      1
>  #define num_booting_cpus()                     1
> -#define cpu_possible(cpu)                              ({ BUG_ON((cpu) != 0); 1; })
> +#define cpu_possible(cpu)                      ({ BUG_ON((cpu) != 0); 1; })
> +static inline void set_cpu_online(int cpu)
> +{}
> +static inline void set_cpu_possible(int cpu)
> +{}
> +
> 
>  struct notifier_block;
> 
> 
> _
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use
  2002-12-22  8:38         ` Andrew Morton
  2002-12-22  9:58           ` george anzinger
@ 2002-12-22 21:14           ` Martin J. Bligh
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Martin J. Bligh @ 2002-12-22 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Andrew Morton, george anzinger
  Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell

> The boot cpu is set online extremely late.  Strangely late.  Why
> is this?
>
> How about something like the below?  We mark the boot cpu
> online in generic code as soon as it has initialised its per-cpu
> storage (seems appropriate?)

I seem to recall some related problem with the topology stuff ...
anyway, I tested your patch on a 16-way NUMA-Q and it works just fine.
Thanks for fixing that up ....

> This will then allow that cpu to actually start calling into console
> drivers, if they have been registered.  If those drivers do a mod_timer()
> (as the vga console does) then that will work OK.

Would be nice to shift generic console_init earlier, if that's what
you're implying, but we still need early_printk for setup_arch.

M.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-22 21:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-20  8:43 [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use george anzinger
2002-12-20 10:26 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-20 17:18   ` george anzinger
2002-12-20 19:34     ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-20 20:01       ` george anzinger
2002-12-20 20:31         ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-22  8:38         ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-22  9:58           ` george anzinger
2002-12-22 21:14           ` Martin J. Bligh

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.