* [linux-lvm] pvcreate once more
@ 1999-06-21 14:30 Udo Weber
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Udo Weber @ 1999-06-21 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6747 bytes --]
Hi,
sorry for the last mail, I don't know why but something was left of this
mail.
Here now (I hope so) the complete mail once more and for insurence also
the same as
attachment:
******************************************************************
Hi LVM-specialists,
I'm new here the Linux-LVM-array. This means I was downloading all
needed software+patches, compiled successfull and also installed without
erors on my IBM-Thinkpad (300 MHz PII, 128 MB RAM, 8GByte HD).
I have all my LINUX-stuff on several extended partitions.
Now at first some generally questions (I don't found an answer for this
in the docu):
Is it possible to create a PV on a extended partion or do I need only
primary partions ?
I think pvcreate writes something at the top of the physical volume (
whole PV or partion).
Do that works well with other OS-formated parts of the same hdisk ?
If the first question is no, forget the rest of this mail!
If it should works please help. Here are all infos related to my
problem:
################################################################
Welcome to SuSE Linux 6.1 (i386) - Kernel 2.2.10 (tty4).
mumpel:~ # vgscan
vgscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a while...)
vgscan -- "/etc/lvmtab" and "/etc/lvmtab.d" successfully created
vgscan -- WARNING: you may not have an actual backup of your volume
group
mumpel:~ # vgchange -a y
vgchange -- no volume groups found
mumpel:~ # cat /proc/lvm
LVM module version 0.6 (26/02/1999)
Total: 0 VGs 0 PVs 0 LVs (0 LVs open)
Global: 139 bytes vmalloced IOP version: 4 0:21:47 active
mumpel:~ # fdisk -l
Disk /dev/hda: 240 heads, 63 sectors, 1058 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 15120 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 271 2048728+ b Win95 FAT32
/dev/hda2 272 1057 5942160 f Win95 Extended (LBA)
/dev/hda5 272 548 2094088+ 6 DOS 16-bit >=32M
/dev/hda6 549 687 1050808+ 6 DOS 16-bit >=32M
/dev/hda7 688 705 136048 82 Linux swap
/dev/hda8 706 841 1028128 83 Linux native
/dev/hda9 842 977 1028128+ 83 Linux native
/dev/hda10 978 1057 604768 fe Unknown
mumpel:~ # pvcreate /dev/hda10
pvcreate -- extended partition "/dev/hda10" doesn't exist
mumpel:~ # uname -a
Linux mumpel 2.2.10 #1 Sun Jun 20 02:03:14 MEST 1999 i686 unknown
mumpel:~ # lsmod
Module Size Used by
lvm 29472 0 (autoclean)
sd_mod 15856 0 (autoclean) (unused)
dummy0 684 1 (autoclean)
nls_iso8859-1 2020 3 (autoclean)
nls_cp437 3548 3 (autoclean)
vfat 11292 3 (autoclean)
fat 25600 3 (autoclean) [vfat]
mumpel:~ # ls -l /dev/hda* /dev/lvm
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 0 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 1 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda1
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 10 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda10
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 11 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda11
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 12 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda12
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 13 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda13
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 14 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda14
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 15 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda15
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 2 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda2
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 3 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda3
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 4 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda4
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 5 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda5
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 6 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda6
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 7 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda7
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 8 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda8
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 3, 9 May 1 00:50 /dev/hda9
crw-r----- 1 root root 109, 0 Jun 20 02:47 /dev/lvm
mumpel:~ # mount
/dev/hda9 on / type ext2 (rw)
proc on /proc type proc (rw)
/dev/hda1 on /C type vfat (rw)
/dev/hda5 on /D type vfat (rw)
/dev/hda6 on /E type vfat (rw)
/dev/hda8 on /REDHAT type ext2 (rw)
none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw)
and here now the debug-info from pvcreate:
mumpel:~ # pvcreate -d /dev/hda10
lvm_iop_version -- CALLED
lv_status_internal -- AFTER ioctl ret: 0
lvm_iop_version -- LEAVING with ret: 0
pv_check_name -- CALLED
lvm_check_chars -- CALLED
lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING
pv_check_name -- CALLED pv_name: "/dev/hda10"
pv_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
pv_get_size -- CALLED with /dev/hda10 and BFFFF70C
pv_check_name -- CALLED
lvm_check_chars -- CALLED
lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING
pv_check_name -- CALLED pv_name: "/dev/hda10"
pv_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
pv_check_part -- CALLED with /dev/hda10
pv_check_name -- CALLED
lvm_check_chars -- CALLED
lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING
pv_check_name -- CALLED pv_name: "/dev/hda10"
pv_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
pv_check_part -- LEAVING with 10
pv_get_size -- BEFORE llseek 0:0
pv_get_size -- part[0].sys_ind: B part[0].nr_sects: 4097457
pv_get_size -- first == 1
pv_get_size -- part[1].sys_ind: F part[1].nr_sects: 11884320
pv_get_size -- first == 1
pv_get_size -- part[2].sys_ind: 0 part[2].nr_sects: 0
pv_get_size -- first == 1
pv_get_size -- part[3].sys_ind: 0 part[3].nr_sects: 0
pv_get_size -- first == 1
pv_get_size -- LEAVING with ret: -242
pvcreate -- extended partition "/dev/hda10" doesn't exist
The same on RedHat 6.0 - same config.
only one different output:
[root@mumpel 0.6]# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/hda: 240 heads, 63 sectors, 1058 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 15120 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 271 2048728+ b Win95 FAT32
/dev/hda2 272 1057 5942160 f Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hda5 272 548 2094088+ 6 FAT16
/dev/hda6 549 687 1050808+ 6 FAT16
/dev/hda7 688 705 136048 82 Linux swap
/dev/hda8 706 841 1028128 83 Linux
/dev/hda9 842 977 1028128+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda10 978 1057 604768 fe LANstep
##########################################################################
What was going wrong here ?
What should I do ?
I'd like to use the LVM for testing. I'm primary working in the
AIX-support-center.
My special field there are LVM-problems :)
Thanks with warm regards,
Udo Weber
***************************************************************************
Maybe I put a dot (".") too much between the lines in the last email :)
But the prob should be the same, I read the answers from Heinz, now I
think here is realy
a problem.
Thanks,
Udo
[-- Attachment #2: Lvm.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 56 bytes --]
Welcome to SuSE Linux 6.1 (i386) - Kernel 2.2.10 (tty4).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] pvcreate once more
@ 1999-06-21 16:32 Steve_J_Brueggeman
1999-06-21 16:49 ` Udo Weber
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steve_J_Brueggeman @ 1999-06-21 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw
To: linux-lvm
Oops, I forgot to copy the list.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve J Brueggeman on 06/21/99 11:34 AM
---------------------------
Steve J Brueggeman
06/21/99 11:30 AM
To: Udo Weber <udo.weber@mainz.ibm.de> @ INTERNET
cc:
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] pvcreate once more (Document link not converted)
Yep, you've found a bug. The problem is that you've got a Win-98 extended
partition, (ID=0x0f).
When LVM goes through to determine the validity of the partition you
specified, it does not recognize that you have any extended partitions,
thusly, does not scan for any logical partions on an extended partition.
Try this patch. (WARNING!! I have not tried this patch, so use at your own
risk!!!))
To apply this patch, cut-it-out of your E-Mail, and type the following
cd {your-lvm-source-tree}; patch -p1 <{win98-patch-filename}
Where {your-lvm-source-tree} is the name of the directory you untared the
LVM sources, and {win98-patch-filename} is the directory/filename of the
patch file listed below. (don't type the braces in the command line above)
Steve Brueggeman
-------------Cut here--------------
diff -Naur 0.6.new.b/tools/lib/pv_get_size.c
0.6.new.c/tools/lib/pv_get_size.c
--- 0.6.new.b/tools/lib/pv_get_size.c Thu Feb 25 18:46:28 1999
+++ 0.6.new.c/tools/lib/pv_get_size.c Mon Jun 21 11:19:39 1999
@@ -111,10 +111,11 @@
i, part[i].sys_ind, i, part[i].nr_sects);
#endif
/* is it a welcome extended partition? */
- if ( part[i].sys_ind == DOS_EXTENDED_PARTITION ||
+ if ( part[i].sys_ind == DOS_EXTENDED_PARTITION ||
+ part[i].sys_ind == WIN98_EXTENDED_PARTITION ||
part[i].sys_ind == LINUX_EXTENDED_PARTITION) {
#ifdef DEBUG
- debug ( "pv_get_size -- DOS/LINUX_EXTENDED_PARTITION\n");
+ debug ( "pv_get_size --
DOS/LINUX/WIN98_EXTENDED_PARTITION\n");
#endif
extended_flag = 1;
offset = extended_offset + part[i].start_sect;
diff -Naur 0.6.new.b/tools/pvcreate.c 0.6.new.c/tools/pvcreate.c
--- 0.6.new.b/tools/pvcreate.c Thu Feb 25 18:46:29 1999
+++ 0.6.new.c/tools/pvcreate.c Mon Jun 21 11:22:55 1999
@@ -199,6 +199,11 @@
"\"%s\"\n",
cmd, pv_name);
continue;
+ } else if ( part.sys_ind == WIN98_EXTENDED_PARTITION) {
+ fprintf ( stderr, "%s -- can't use Win-98 extended partition "
+ "\"%s\"\n",
+ cmd, pv_name);
+ continue;
} else if ( part.sys_ind != LVM_PARTITION) {
fprintf ( stderr, "%s -- invalid partition type 0x%x for
\"%s\""
" (must be 0x%x)\n", cmd, part.sys_ind,
-------------Cut here--------------
Udo Weber <udo.weber@mainz.ibm.de> on 06/21/99 09:30:16 AM
To: linux-lvm@msede.com
cc: (bcc: Steve J Brueggeman)
Subject: [linux-lvm] pvcreate once more
Hi,
sorry for the last mail, I don't know why but something was left of this
mail.
Here now (I hope so) the complete mail once more and for insurence also
the same as
attachment:
******************************************************************
Hi LVM-specialists,
<Snippage>
mumpel:~ # fdisk -l
Disk /dev/hda: 240 heads, 63 sectors, 1058 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 15120 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 271 2048728+ b Win95 FAT32
/dev/hda2 272 1057 5942160 f Win95 Extended (LBA)
/dev/hda5 272 548 2094088+ 6 DOS 16-bit >=32M
/dev/hda6 549 687 1050808+ 6 DOS 16-bit >=32M
/dev/hda7 688 705 136048 82 Linux swap
/dev/hda8 706 841 1028128 83 Linux native
/dev/hda9 842 977 1028128+ 83 Linux native
/dev/hda10 978 1057 604768 fe Unknown
mumpel:~ # pvcreate /dev/hda10
pvcreate -- extended partition "/dev/hda10" doesn't exist
and here now the debug-info from pvcreate:
mumpel:~ # pvcreate -d /dev/hda10
lvm_iop_version -- CALLED
lv_status_internal -- AFTER ioctl ret: 0
lvm_iop_version -- LEAVING with ret: 0
pv_check_name -- CALLED
lvm_check_chars -- CALLED
lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING
pv_check_name -- CALLED pv_name: "/dev/hda10"
pv_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
pv_get_size -- CALLED with /dev/hda10 and BFFFF70C
pv_check_name -- CALLED
lvm_check_chars -- CALLED
lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING
pv_check_name -- CALLED pv_name: "/dev/hda10"
pv_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
pv_check_part -- CALLED with /dev/hda10
pv_check_name -- CALLED
lvm_check_chars -- CALLED
lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING
pv_check_name -- CALLED pv_name: "/dev/hda10"
pv_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
pv_check_part -- LEAVING with 10
pv_get_size -- BEFORE llseek 0:0
pv_get_size -- part[0].sys_ind: B part[0].nr_sects: 4097457
pv_get_size -- first == 1
pv_get_size -- part[1].sys_ind: F part[1].nr_sects: 11884320
pv_get_size -- first == 1
pv_get_size -- part[2].sys_ind: 0 part[2].nr_sects: 0
pv_get_size -- first == 1
pv_get_size -- part[3].sys_ind: 0 part[3].nr_sects: 0
pv_get_size -- first == 1
pv_get_size -- LEAVING with ret: -242
pvcreate -- extended partition "/dev/hda10" doesn't exist
The same on RedHat 6.0 - same config.
only one different output:
[root@mumpel 0.6]# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/hda: 240 heads, 63 sectors, 1058 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 15120 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 271 2048728+ b Win95 FAT32
/dev/hda2 272 1057 5942160 f Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hda5 272 548 2094088+ 6 FAT16
/dev/hda6 549 687 1050808+ 6 FAT16
/dev/hda7 688 705 136048 82 Linux swap
/dev/hda8 706 841 1028128 83 Linux
/dev/hda9 842 977 1028128+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda10 978 1057 604768 fe LANstep
##########################################################################
What was going wrong here ?
What should I do ?
I'd like to use the LVM for testing. I'm primary working in the
AIX-support-center.
My special field there are LVM-problems :)
Thanks with warm regards,
Udo Weber
***************************************************************************
Maybe I put a dot (".") too much between the lines in the last email :)
But the prob should be the same, I read the answers from Heinz, now I
think here is realy
a problem.
Thanks,
Udo
Welcome to SuSE Linux 6.1 (i386) - Kernel 2.2.10 (tty4).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] pvcreate once more
1999-06-21 16:32 Steve_J_Brueggeman
@ 1999-06-21 16:49 ` Udo Weber
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Udo Weber @ 1999-06-21 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Steve_J_Brueggeman; +Cc: linux-lvm
Howdy,
first thanks for the patch.
But I can't test it at first, sorry. I'm on a business-travel ( 3 month
duration) in Austin TX
(where the AIX-LVM was build :) ). On my Thinkpad at the WIN/DOS-part are
important data for my job and I don't have any backup/install- or other stuff
to recover if anything goes wrong. This means I can't risc to destroy my
extended win-partition.
So it would be nice if anywhere else can tell me if the patch from Steve works.
Sorry for my care, I hope you understand my situation.
Thanks,
Udo
Steve_J_Brueggeman@notes.seagate.com wrote:
> Oops, I forgot to copy the list.
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Steve J Brueggeman on 06/21/99 11:34 AM
> ---------------------------
>
> Steve J Brueggeman
> 06/21/99 11:30 AM
>
> To: Udo Weber <udo.weber@mainz.ibm.de> @ INTERNET
> cc:
>
> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] pvcreate once more (Document link not converted)
>
> Yep, you've found a bug. The problem is that you've got a Win-98 extended
> partition, (ID=0x0f).
>
> When LVM goes through to determine the validity of the partition you
> specified, it does not recognize that you have any extended partitions,
> thusly, does not scan for any logical partions on an extended partition.
>
> Try this patch. (WARNING!! I have not tried this patch, so use at your own
> risk!!!))
> To apply this patch, cut-it-out of your E-Mail, and type the following
> cd {your-lvm-source-tree}; patch -p1 <{win98-patch-filename}
>
> Where {your-lvm-source-tree} is the name of the directory you untared the
> LVM sources, and {win98-patch-filename} is the directory/filename of the
> patch file listed below. (don't type the braces in the command line above)
>
> Steve Brueggeman
>
> -------------Cut here--------------
> diff -Naur 0.6.new.b/tools/lib/pv_get_size.c
> 0.6.new.c/tools/lib/pv_get_size.c
> --- 0.6.new.b/tools/lib/pv_get_size.c Thu Feb 25 18:46:28 1999
> +++ 0.6.new.c/tools/lib/pv_get_size.c Mon Jun 21 11:19:39 1999
> @@ -111,10 +111,11 @@
> i, part[i].sys_ind, i, part[i].nr_sects);
> #endif
> /* is it a welcome extended partition? */
> - if ( part[i].sys_ind == DOS_EXTENDED_PARTITION ||
> + if ( part[i].sys_ind == DOS_EXTENDED_PARTITION ||
> + part[i].sys_ind == WIN98_EXTENDED_PARTITION ||
> part[i].sys_ind == LINUX_EXTENDED_PARTITION) {
> #ifdef DEBUG
> - debug ( "pv_get_size -- DOS/LINUX_EXTENDED_PARTITION\n");
> + debug ( "pv_get_size --
> DOS/LINUX/WIN98_EXTENDED_PARTITION\n");
> #endif
> extended_flag = 1;
> offset = extended_offset + part[i].start_sect;
> diff -Naur 0.6.new.b/tools/pvcreate.c 0.6.new.c/tools/pvcreate.c
> --- 0.6.new.b/tools/pvcreate.c Thu Feb 25 18:46:29 1999
> +++ 0.6.new.c/tools/pvcreate.c Mon Jun 21 11:22:55 1999
> @@ -199,6 +199,11 @@
> "\"%s\"\n",
> cmd, pv_name);
> continue;
> + } else if ( part.sys_ind == WIN98_EXTENDED_PARTITION) {
> + fprintf ( stderr, "%s -- can't use Win-98 extended partition "
> + "\"%s\"\n",
> + cmd, pv_name);
> + continue;
> } else if ( part.sys_ind != LVM_PARTITION) {
> fprintf ( stderr, "%s -- invalid partition type 0x%x for
> \"%s\""
> " (must be 0x%x)\n", cmd, part.sys_ind,
> -------------Cut here--------------
>
> Udo Weber <udo.weber@mainz.ibm.de> on 06/21/99 09:30:16 AM
>
> To: linux-lvm@msede.com
> cc: (bcc: Steve J Brueggeman)
>
> Subject: [linux-lvm] pvcreate once more
>
> Hi,
> sorry for the last mail, I don't know why but something was left of this
> mail.
> Here now (I hope so) the complete mail once more and for insurence also
> the same as
> attachment:
> ******************************************************************
> Hi LVM-specialists,
>
> <Snippage>
> mumpel:~ # fdisk -l
>
> Disk /dev/hda: 240 heads, 63 sectors, 1058 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 15120 * 512 bytes
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/hda1 * 1 271 2048728+ b Win95 FAT32
> /dev/hda2 272 1057 5942160 f Win95 Extended (LBA)
> /dev/hda5 272 548 2094088+ 6 DOS 16-bit >=32M
> /dev/hda6 549 687 1050808+ 6 DOS 16-bit >=32M
> /dev/hda7 688 705 136048 82 Linux swap
> /dev/hda8 706 841 1028128 83 Linux native
> /dev/hda9 842 977 1028128+ 83 Linux native
> /dev/hda10 978 1057 604768 fe Unknown
>
> mumpel:~ # pvcreate /dev/hda10
> pvcreate -- extended partition "/dev/hda10" doesn't exist
>
> and here now the debug-info from pvcreate:
> mumpel:~ # pvcreate -d /dev/hda10
> lvm_iop_version -- CALLED
> lv_status_internal -- AFTER ioctl ret: 0
> lvm_iop_version -- LEAVING with ret: 0
> pv_check_name -- CALLED
> lvm_check_chars -- CALLED
> lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING
> pv_check_name -- CALLED pv_name: "/dev/hda10"
> pv_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
> pv_get_size -- CALLED with /dev/hda10 and BFFFF70C
> pv_check_name -- CALLED
> lvm_check_chars -- CALLED
> lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING
> pv_check_name -- CALLED pv_name: "/dev/hda10"
> pv_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
> pv_check_part -- CALLED with /dev/hda10
> pv_check_name -- CALLED
> lvm_check_chars -- CALLED
> lvm_check_chars -- LEAVING
> pv_check_name -- CALLED pv_name: "/dev/hda10"
> pv_check_name -- LEAVING with ret: 0
> pv_check_part -- LEAVING with 10
> pv_get_size -- BEFORE llseek 0:0
> pv_get_size -- part[0].sys_ind: B part[0].nr_sects: 4097457
> pv_get_size -- first == 1
> pv_get_size -- part[1].sys_ind: F part[1].nr_sects: 11884320
> pv_get_size -- first == 1
> pv_get_size -- part[2].sys_ind: 0 part[2].nr_sects: 0
> pv_get_size -- first == 1
> pv_get_size -- part[3].sys_ind: 0 part[3].nr_sects: 0
> pv_get_size -- first == 1
> pv_get_size -- LEAVING with ret: -242
> pvcreate -- extended partition "/dev/hda10" doesn't exist
>
> The same on RedHat 6.0 - same config.
> only one different output:
> [root@mumpel 0.6]# fdisk -l
> Disk /dev/hda: 240 heads, 63 sectors, 1058 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 15120 * 512 bytes
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/hda1 * 1 271 2048728+ b Win95 FAT32
> /dev/hda2 272 1057 5942160 f Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
> /dev/hda5 272 548 2094088+ 6 FAT16
> /dev/hda6 549 687 1050808+ 6 FAT16
> /dev/hda7 688 705 136048 82 Linux swap
> /dev/hda8 706 841 1028128 83 Linux
> /dev/hda9 842 977 1028128+ 83 Linux
> /dev/hda10 978 1057 604768 fe LANstep
>
> ##########################################################################
>
> What was going wrong here ?
> What should I do ?
>
> I'd like to use the LVM for testing. I'm primary working in the
> AIX-support-center.
> My special field there are LVM-problems :)
>
> Thanks with warm regards,
> Udo Weber
> ***************************************************************************
>
> Maybe I put a dot (".") too much between the lines in the last email :)
>
> But the prob should be the same, I read the answers from Heinz, now I
> think here is realy
> a problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Udo
>
> Welcome to SuSE Linux 6.1 (i386) - Kernel 2.2.10 (tty4).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-06-21 16:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-06-21 14:30 [linux-lvm] pvcreate once more Udo Weber
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-06-21 16:32 Steve_J_Brueggeman
1999-06-21 16:49 ` Udo Weber
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.