All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Changhui Zhong <czhong@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Block Devices <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	io-uring <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [bug report] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 679 at io_uring/io_uring.c:2835 io_ring_exit_work+0x2b6/0x2e0
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 13:40:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2836d7dc-4afd-49d8-8405-d888f2b3fc95@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34d7e331-e258-4dda-a21b-5327664d0d04@kernel.dk>

On 4/16/24 13:24, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/16/24 6:14 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 4/16/24 12:38, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 4/16/24 4:00 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 10:26:16AM +0800, Changhui Zhong wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can't reproduce this here, fwiw. Ming, something you've seen?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just test against the latest for-next/block(-rc4 based), and still can't
>>>>>> reproduce it. There was such RH internal report before, and maybe not
>>>>>> ublk related.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changhui, if the issue can be reproduced in your machine, care to share
>>>>>> your machine for me to investigate a bit?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Ming
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I still can reproduce this issue on my machine?
>>>>> and I shared machine to Ming?he can do more investigation for this issue?
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 1244.207092] running generic/006
>>>>> [ 1246.456896] blk_print_req_error: 77 callbacks suppressed
>>>>> [ 1246.456907] I/O error, dev ublkb1, sector 2395864 op 0x1:(WRITE)
>>>>> flags 0x8800 phys_seg 1 prio class 0
>>>>
>>>> The failure is actually triggered in recovering qcow2 target in generic/005,
>>>> since ublkb0 isn't removed successfully in generic/005.
>>>>
>>>> git-bisect shows that the 1st bad commit is cca6571381a0 ("io_uring/rw:
>>>> cleanup retry path").
>>>>
>>>> And not see any issue in uring command side, so the trouble seems
>>>> in normal io_uring rw side over XFS file, and not related with block
>>>> device.
>>>
>>> Indeed, I can reproduce it on XFS as well. I'll take a look.
>>
>> Looking at this patch, that io_rw_should_reissue() path is for when
>> we failed via the kiocb callback but came there off of the submission
>> path, so when we unwind back it finds the flag, preps and resubmits
>> the req. If it's not the case but we still return "true", it'd leaks
>> the request, which would explains why exit_work gets stuck.
> 
> Yep, this is what happens. I have a test patch that just punts any
> reissue to task_work, it'll insert to iowq from there. Before we would
> fail it, even though we didn't have to, but that check was killed and
> then it just lingers for this case and it's lost.

Sounds good, but let me note that while unwinding, block/fs/etc
could try to revert the iter, so it might not be safe to initiate
async IO from the callback as is

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-16 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-15  9:14 [bug report] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 679 at io_uring/io_uring.c:2835 io_ring_exit_work+0x2b6/0x2e0 Changhui Zhong
2024-04-15 14:28 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16  1:25   ` Ming Lei
2024-04-16  2:26     ` Changhui Zhong
2024-04-16 10:00       ` Ming Lei
2024-04-16 11:38         ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16 12:14           ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-16 12:24             ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16 12:40               ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2024-04-16 12:51                 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16 13:08                   ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-16 12:35           ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16 12:53             ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2836d7dc-4afd-49d8-8405-d888f2b3fc95@gmail.com \
    --to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=czhong@redhat.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.