From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46263C2B9F4 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF60260FE5 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:37:16 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DF60260FE5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56730 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lssOa-0006Nj-4H for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:37:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lssLv-0008QH-4n; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:34:31 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::332]:34469) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lssLt-0005zZ-74; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:34:30 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id w22-20020a0568304116b02904060c6415c7so9636777ott.1; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:34:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=Vh5C5adlkwWDHCjhndqAphgFzNLlmqEewOmbcb8yvoI=; b=hPUUaTtqIoRXsXa3hSGT4GIffHInIqef8zcGvmcM/+fV/mKkHwKPKfCEMiJqmXSBkp hMSLxEtgvqJ3A5dv9r7KTQb+mYq9AKt8PPJsXT4U9I8zGV1I+T7wiO3owHqfI5ZFnmJs mtW3nSon7SFRWI1BpSPF2z4/EblKE7uxXC4j2jEeCs3Rn1JofPF+Xur17sBbgQ9BGJDA KthQfW6x15ub5gv4Fb+PguZiJrBlpL62/xICoghYoz9YM/l8zCYNdNeqnRJZZxnVs92K 9bXj41+G+WnlvLA68DwgysPY3EtjT7n/+Yn/nGiwU8nrb4hMZOG5BLsv6OrYWQPUB1c0 tH3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :reply-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=Vh5C5adlkwWDHCjhndqAphgFzNLlmqEewOmbcb8yvoI=; b=bfOqqFMV8VF+hcLHMJJPsUSGlBOKTzF2fKWJv0txRwlymsnXMg9QlU/YhWRloIWsqw N5Y+mQsTYnaSzLdJ3JFyWtvO9yq4c6IIuL509VaDTYfsoooWPC6t4slZgdkxpYRqsM+p h88p66rwG//oijCgxnGxzR9cdwEbne0kQk/tbreJxNl5jZPWSMU4rx5BqqxlgPjKijNL slpxBuWvzUGm6rARyDULS02edcZRw8vmOWgMebuzxVdli3eCv4Ik3T7r6RWPhPhfzEI8 6TkdN4RopyWyZ6BTXvhMCicr7K2IioZaP258JixItUmxSTB7hK0ZWOaQzzufpCt/oJe8 6ORA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530XYxxlYsyZsnrgmdxbhcMx6otN4e2pttBdf7ovr0elFmRwWfQ3 HoO3p4nIVcOSr25vM9UHXQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtu5vUQx3wwjeK7IK/fOkTI1gR8/hAaR7J4wJW9MIOmDXww0vD1KSzNHvmLBCKsXZ9AIVcQg== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:945:: with SMTP id 63mr14917814otp.47.1623699266841; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:34:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from serve.minyard.net (serve.minyard.net. [2001:470:b8f6:1b::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u42sm2886396oiw.50.2021.06.14.12.34.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:34:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from minyard.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:b8f6:1b:50dd:ab38:f475:bd86]) by serve.minyard.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 138AF181192; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 14:34:23 -0500 From: Corey Minyard To: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] i2c: Match parameters of i2c_start_transfer and i2c_send_recv Message-ID: <20210614193423.GE2921206@minyard.net> References: <20200623063123.20776-1-f4bug@amsat.org> <46692025-50b-2734-e394-513b2761b979@eik.bme.hu> <8230aaa5-73b4-4bf6-6567-38bb5cde3883@amsat.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::332; envelope-from=tcminyard@gmail.com; helo=mail-ot1-x332.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: minyard@acm.org Cc: Corey Minyard , David Gibson , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 06:48:05PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 6/14/21 12:02 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > >> On 6/12/21 9:33 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > >>>> This is v2 of Zoltan's patch: > >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg714711.html > >>>> > >>>> - rebased > >>>> - added docstring > >>>> - include hw/misc/auxbus.c fix > >>>> > >>>> Supersedes: <20200621145235.9E241745712@zero.eik.bme.hu> > >>> > >>> What happened to this series? I did not find it in patchew, only my > >>> original patch: > >>> > >>> https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200621145235.9E241745712@zero.eik.bme.hu/ > >>> > >>> I still have this in one of my branches so I think it was not merged at > >>> the end. Could this be resurrected or should I forget about it and live > >>> with the inconsistency in parameters instead? > >> > >> I suppose it was not queued because you asked to remove the > >> "Reported-by" tag :/ I agree with you it would be nice to get this in > >> the tree > > > > I think I said only Reported-by is enough no need for Suggested-by as > > well but I don't see this as a reason to drop these patches. So maybe > > just nobody cared enough. > > Ah OK now got it. > > >> for good. However 1 year passed, so it might need adjustment. > > > > Should I try to rebase it or will you do it eventually? > > Found the branch and clean rebase, so no change needed. > > Corey, if you are busy, I could send a pull request if you provide > and Acked-by tag. I'm somewhat worried about the silent semantic change. I would much prefer the functions to be renamed, as you mentioned in an email a while ago. I think that you mentioned this in an email in the chain listed above, and I think I pulled it for that reason. -corey > > Regards, > > Phil. >