All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf probe: Print a hint if adding a probe fails
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 19:29:26 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210610192926.6f7b606f1fefd285b3907cd5@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210610094442.1602714-1-naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Hi Naveen,

On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:14:42 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Adding a probe can fail in a few scenarios. perf already checks for the
> address in the kprobe blacklist. However, the address could still be a
> jump label, or have a BUG_ON(). In such cases, it isn't always evident
> why adding the probe failed. Add a hint so that the user knows how to
> proceed.
> 

Thanks for the report.

Since now there is <tracefs>/error_log, if you see any errors in registering
probe-events, perf probe should dump the error_log for the hint message.
Also, kprobes should return the correct different error code for each
errors.

Thank you,

> Reported-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-probe.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> index 6b150756677014..ff9f3fdce600dd 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> @@ -352,8 +352,11 @@ static int perf_add_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs)
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = apply_perf_probe_events(pevs, npevs);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		pr_info("Hint: Check dmesg to understand reason for probe failure.\n"
> +			"      Consider probing at the next/previous instruction.\n");
>  		goto out_cleanup;
> +	}
>  
>  	for (i = k = 0; i < npevs; i++)
>  		k += pevs[i].ntevs;
> 
> base-commit: 0808b3d5b7514dc856178dbc509929329bbf301d
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-10 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-10  9:44 [PATCH] tools/perf probe: Print a hint if adding a probe fails Naveen N. Rao
2021-06-10 10:29 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2021-06-18 13:15   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-06-21  9:40     ` Naveen N. Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210610192926.6f7b606f1fefd285b3907cd5@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.