All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uclinux-dist-devel] freezer: should barriers be smp ?
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:57:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110415165737.GA23812__24948.5459215522$1302887315$gmane$org@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikaymG-5-YoTnG2SPJCnBtXPpfHBQ@mail.gmail.com>

> >> The existing code is correct but it isn't optimal.
> >>
> >> wmb() and rmb() are heavy-duty operations, and you don't want to call
> >> them when they aren't needed.  That's exactly what smp_wmb() and
> >> smp_rmb() are for -- they call wmb() and rmb(), but only in SMP
> >> kernels.
> >>
> >> Unless you need to synchronize with another processor (not necessarily
> >> a CPU, it could be something embedded within a device), you should
> >> always use smp_wmb() and smp_rmb() rather than wmb() and rmb().
> >
> > Maybe; but this code is not performance critical and I believe being
> > obvious here is better...
> 
> isnt it though ?  especially when we talk about suspending/resuming on
> embedded systems to get more savings over just cpu idle ?  we want
> that latency to be as low as possible.

Feel free to measure the difference. I bet it is lost in noise,
freezer just is not _that_ hot path.

								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-15 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-13  6:14 freezer: should barriers be smp ? Mike Frysinger
2011-04-13 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-13 21:02   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-13 21:05     ` Pavel Machek
2011-04-13 21:05     ` Pavel Machek
2011-04-13 21:11       ` [uclinux-dist-devel] " Mike Frysinger
2011-04-13 21:53         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-13 21:53         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-13 22:11           ` Alan Stern
2011-04-13 22:11           ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2011-04-13 22:34             ` [uclinux-dist-devel] freezer: should barriers be smp? Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-13 22:34             ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-14 14:55               ` Alan Stern
2011-04-14 22:34                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-15 14:32                   ` Alan Stern
2011-04-15 14:32                   ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2011-04-14 22:34                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-14 14:55               ` Alan Stern
2011-04-13 22:22           ` [uclinux-dist-devel] freezer: should barriers be smp ? Mike Frysinger
2011-04-13 22:22           ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-13 22:49             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-13 22:53               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-13 22:53               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-13 22:57               ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-13 23:12                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-13 23:12                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-14 15:13                 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2011-04-14 22:40                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-14 22:40                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-14 15:13                 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-13 22:57               ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-13 22:49             ` [uclinux-dist-devel] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-13 22:04         ` Alan Stern
2011-04-13 22:04         ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2011-04-15 16:29           ` Pavel Machek
2011-04-15 16:29           ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2011-04-15 16:33             ` [uclinux-dist-devel] [linux-pm] " Mike Frysinger
2011-04-15 16:57               ` Pavel Machek
2011-04-15 16:57               ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2011-04-15 23:11               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-15 23:24                 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-15 23:30                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-15 23:30                   ` [uclinux-dist-devel] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-15 23:24                 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-15 23:11               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-15 16:33             ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-13 21:11       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-13 21:02   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-13 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='20110415165737.GA23812__24948.5459215522$1302887315$gmane$org@elf.ucw.cz' \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.