All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/1 net-2.6.26] [XFRM]: Compilation warnings in xfrm_user.c.
@ 2008-04-14 13:03 Denis V. Lunev
  2008-04-14 14:35 ` Paul Moore
  2008-04-14 21:48 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Denis V. Lunev @ 2008-04-14 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: davem; +Cc: herbert, paul.moore, netdev, Denis V. Lunev

When CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM is undefined the following warnings appears:
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c: In function 'xfrm_add_pol_expire':
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1576: warning: 'ctx' may be used uninitialized in this function
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c: In function 'xfrm_get_policy':
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1340: warning: 'ctx' may be used uninitialized in this function
(security_xfrm_policy_alloc is noop for the case).

It seems that they are result of the commit
03e1ad7b5d871d4189b1da3125c2f12d1b5f7d0b

Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c |    8 ++++----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index b822b56..1810f56 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1343,14 +1343,14 @@ static int xfrm_get_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 
+		ctx = NULL;
 		if (rt) {
 			struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx = nla_data(rt);
 
 			err = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&ctx, uctx);
 			if (err)
 				return err;
-		} else
-			ctx = NULL;
+		}
 		xp = xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(type, p->dir, &p->sel, ctx,
 					   delete, &err);
 		security_xfrm_policy_free(ctx);
@@ -1579,14 +1579,14 @@ static int xfrm_add_pol_expire(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 
+		ctx = NULL;
 		if (rt) {
 			struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx = nla_data(rt);
 
 			err = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&ctx, uctx);
 			if (err)
 				return err;
-		} else
-			ctx = NULL;
+		}
 		xp = xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(type, p->dir, &p->sel, ctx, 0, &err);
 		security_xfrm_policy_free(ctx);
 	}
-- 
1.5.3.rc5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1 net-2.6.26] [XFRM]: Compilation warnings in xfrm_user.c.
  2008-04-14 13:03 [PATCH 1/1 net-2.6.26] [XFRM]: Compilation warnings in xfrm_user.c Denis V. Lunev
@ 2008-04-14 14:35 ` Paul Moore
  2008-04-14 21:52   ` David Miller
  2008-04-14 21:48 ` David Miller
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2008-04-14 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Denis V. Lunev; +Cc: davem, herbert, netdev

On Monday 14 April 2008 9:03:39 am Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> When CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM is undefined the following warnings
> appears: net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c: In function 'xfrm_add_pol_expire':
> net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1576: warning: 'ctx' may be used uninitialized
> in this function net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c: In function 'xfrm_get_policy':
> net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1340: warning: 'ctx' may be used uninitialized
> in this function (security_xfrm_policy_alloc is noop for the case).
>
> It seems that they are result of the commit
> 03e1ad7b5d871d4189b1da3125c2f12d1b5f7d0b
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
> ---
>  net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
> index b822b56..1810f56 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
> @@ -1343,14 +1343,14 @@ static int xfrm_get_policy(struct sk_buff
> *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, if (err)
>  			return err;
>
> +		ctx = NULL;
>  		if (rt) {
>  			struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx = nla_data(rt);
>
>  			err = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&ctx, uctx);
>  			if (err)
>  				return err;
> -		} else
> -			ctx = NULL;
> +		}
>  		xp = xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(type, p->dir, &p->sel, ctx,
>  					   delete, &err);
>  		security_xfrm_policy_free(ctx);

Thanks for catching this, I was focusing more on the runtime issues with 
the else statement and forgot about compile time issues.  I wonder if 
it would be better to fix this in the dummy function for 
security_xfrm_policy_alloc()?  It seems cleaner to me.

-- 
paul moore
linux @ hp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1 net-2.6.26] [XFRM]: Compilation warnings in xfrm_user.c.
  2008-04-14 13:03 [PATCH 1/1 net-2.6.26] [XFRM]: Compilation warnings in xfrm_user.c Denis V. Lunev
  2008-04-14 14:35 ` Paul Moore
@ 2008-04-14 21:48 ` David Miller
  2008-04-15  5:48   ` Denis V. Lunev
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2008-04-14 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: den; +Cc: herbert, paul.moore, netdev

From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:03:39 +0400

> When CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM is undefined the following warnings appears:
> net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c: In function 'xfrm_add_pol_expire':
> net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1576: warning: 'ctx' may be used uninitialized in this function
> net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c: In function 'xfrm_get_policy':
> net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1340: warning: 'ctx' may be used uninitialized in this function
> (security_xfrm_policy_alloc is noop for the case).
> 
> It seems that they are result of the commit
> 03e1ad7b5d871d4189b1da3125c2f12d1b5f7d0b

Needs commit header-line text reference after commit ID, which I've
added.  I think I've mentioned this issue to you on several occaisions
already :-/

> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>

Applied, thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1 net-2.6.26] [XFRM]: Compilation warnings in xfrm_user.c.
  2008-04-14 14:35 ` Paul Moore
@ 2008-04-14 21:52   ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2008-04-14 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: paul.moore; +Cc: den, herbert, netdev

From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:35:46 -0400

> Thanks for catching this, I was focusing more on the runtime issues with 
> the else statement and forgot about compile time issues.  I wonder if 
> it would be better to fix this in the dummy function for 
> security_xfrm_policy_alloc()?  It seems cleaner to me.

I think in this specific case the choice is arbitrary, which is
why I applied his patch.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1 net-2.6.26] [XFRM]: Compilation warnings in xfrm_user.c.
  2008-04-14 21:48 ` David Miller
@ 2008-04-15  5:48   ` Denis V. Lunev
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Denis V. Lunev @ 2008-04-15  5:48 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: David Miller; +Cc: herbert, paul.moore, netdev

On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 14:48 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:03:39 +0400
> 
> > When CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM is undefined the following warnings appears:
> > net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c: In function 'xfrm_add_pol_expire':
> > net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1576: warning: 'ctx' may be used uninitialized in this function
> > net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c: In function 'xfrm_get_policy':
> > net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1340: warning: 'ctx' may be used uninitialized in this function
> > (security_xfrm_policy_alloc is noop for the case).
> > 
> > It seems that they are result of the commit
> > 03e1ad7b5d871d4189b1da3125c2f12d1b5f7d0b
> 
> Needs commit header-line text reference after commit ID, which I've
> added.  I think I've mentioned this issue to you on several occaisions
> already :-/

got it again. Thank you.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-15  5:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-04-14 13:03 [PATCH 1/1 net-2.6.26] [XFRM]: Compilation warnings in xfrm_user.c Denis V. Lunev
2008-04-14 14:35 ` Paul Moore
2008-04-14 21:52   ` David Miller
2008-04-14 21:48 ` David Miller
2008-04-15  5:48   ` Denis V. Lunev

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.