All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: dl-load.c (ld.so) bug??
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:09:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19990621230921.A20471@drow.res.cmu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96L.990621222014.5237C-100000@unix47.andrew.cmu.edu>; from Hollis R Blanchard on Mon, Jun 21, 1999 at 10:48:12PM -0400


On Mon, Jun 21, 1999 at 10:48:12PM -0400, Hollis R Blanchard wrote:
> 
> > No. Electric Fence is designed to catch programming errors, such as
> > attempting to access memory which was not 'malloc'ed. I have traced this
> > down extensively a couple of months ago, and found that it does indeed
> > appear to overrun what it malloced.
> 
> I have two even simpler test cases for you:
> 
> int main(void){
>     char *ptr=NULL;
>     free(ptr);
> }

Well, that one would probably segfault anyway (or at least, is not
guaranteed not to).

> int main(void){
>     char *ptr = (char *)malloc(100);
> }        

That one's a problem, though :)

> If this were the case, wouldn't you expect ridiculous levels of instability?

Depends entirely on what it overwrote.

Dan

/--------------------------------\  /--------------------------------\
|       Daniel Jacobowitz        |__|        SCS Class of 2002       |
|   Debian GNU/Linux Developer    __    Carnegie Mellon University   |
|         dan@debian.org         |  |       dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu      |
\--------------------------------/  \--------------------------------/

[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list.  Replies are ]]
[[ not  forced  back  to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting.   ]]

  reply	other threads:[~1999-06-22  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-06-21 22:52 dl-load.c (ld.so) bug?? Troy Benjegerdes
1999-06-22  0:04 ` Hollis R Blanchard
1999-06-22  1:57   ` Troy Benjegerdes
1999-06-22  2:48     ` Hollis R Blanchard
1999-06-22  3:09       ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
1999-06-22  4:36         ` Peter Chang
1999-06-22 13:52           ` Hollis R Blanchard
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.3.96L.990622003119.5237E-100000@unix47.andrew.cmu.edu>
1999-06-22  4:39 ` Peter Chang
     [not found] <199906231258.HAA25989@www.cedarnet.org>
1999-06-23 13:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
1999-06-23 14:19 ` Hollis R Blanchard
1999-06-23 14:32   ` Kevin Puetz
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.04.9906211749280.27642-100000@narn.local.drgw.n et>
1999-06-23 14:37 ` Franz Sirl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19990621230921.A20471@drow.res.cmu.edu \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.