From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA99068 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 14:27:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA76659 for linux-list; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 14:26:26 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA05085 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 14:26:24 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@uni-koblenz.de) Received: from informatik.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA09065 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 14:26:23 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@uni-koblenz.de) Received: from uni-koblenz.de (pmport-27.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.249.27]) by informatik.uni-koblenz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA17799 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 23:26:20 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by uni-koblenz.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA00575; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 23:25:28 +0200 Message-ID: <19980904232528.A393@uni-koblenz.de> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1998 23:25:28 +0200 From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de To: Ulf Carlsson Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Bug References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1 In-Reply-To: ; from Ulf Carlsson on Fri, Sep 04, 1998 at 08:51:47PM +0200 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Sep 04, 1998 at 08:51:47PM +0200, Ulf Carlsson wrote: > I think you forgot a break in the middle of a switch statement, setting > order to 3 is pretty nonsense otherwise. > I compiled a new kernel with my patch, and I couldn't see any changes. The > VCED is probably handled correctly by the interrupt anyway. Thanks, applied. Note that this bug just resulted in somewhat reduced performance at cost of 28kb more memory used. On SC CPUs we use 8 different empty_zero_page pages to avoid VCED errors completly. Ralf