* [PATCH] cpufreq: create per policy rwsem instead of per cpu cpu_policy_rwsem
@ 2013-09-17 15:50 Viresh Kumar
2013-09-18 7:09 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-09-17 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
srivatsa.bhat, Viresh Kumar
We have per-cpu cpu_policy_rwsem for cpufreq core, but we never use all of them.
We always use rwsem of policy->cpu and so we can actually make this rwsem per
policy instead.
This patch does this change. With this change other tricky situations are also
avoided now, like which lock to take while we are changing policy->cpu, etc.
Suggested-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
Can be taken for 3.13.. Tested on my thinkpad with basic suspend/resume and
hotplug tests.
Was rebased on pm/linux-next with following additional patches:
cpufreq: unlock correct rwsem while updating policy->cpu
cpufreq: make return type of lock_policy_rwsem_{read|write}() as void
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 110 +++++++++++++---------------------------------
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 16 +++++++
2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 28b5386..b428419 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -48,47 +48,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN], cpufreq_cpu_governor);
#endif
/*
- * cpu_policy_rwsem is a per CPU reader-writer semaphore designed to cure
- * all cpufreq/hotplug/workqueue/etc related lock issues.
- *
- * The rules for this semaphore:
- * - Any routine that wants to read from the policy structure will
- * do a down_read on this semaphore.
- * - Any routine that will write to the policy structure and/or may take away
- * the policy altogether (eg. CPU hotplug), will hold this lock in write
- * mode before doing so.
- *
- * Additional rules:
- * - Governor routines that can be called in cpufreq hotplug path should not
- * take this sem as top level hotplug notifier handler takes this.
- * - Lock should not be held across
- * __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
- */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rw_semaphore, cpu_policy_rwsem);
-
-#define lock_policy_rwsem(mode, cpu) \
-static void lock_policy_rwsem_##mode(int cpu) \
-{ \
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu); \
- BUG_ON(!policy); \
- down_##mode(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->cpu)); \
-}
-
-lock_policy_rwsem(read, cpu);
-lock_policy_rwsem(write, cpu);
-
-#define unlock_policy_rwsem(mode, cpu) \
-static void unlock_policy_rwsem_##mode(int cpu) \
-{ \
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu); \
- BUG_ON(!policy); \
- up_##mode(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->cpu)); \
-}
-
-unlock_policy_rwsem(read, cpu);
-unlock_policy_rwsem(write, cpu);
-
-/*
* rwsem to guarantee that cpufreq driver module doesn't unload during critical
* sections
*/
@@ -656,14 +615,14 @@ static ssize_t show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf)
if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem))
return -EINVAL;
- lock_policy_rwsem_read(policy->cpu);
+ down_read(&policy->rwsem);
if (fattr->show)
ret = fattr->show(policy, buf);
else
ret = -EIO;
- unlock_policy_rwsem_read(policy->cpu);
+ up_read(&policy->rwsem);
up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
return ret;
@@ -684,14 +643,14 @@ static ssize_t store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem))
goto unlock;
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (fattr->store)
ret = fattr->store(policy, buf, count);
else
ret = -EIO;
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
unlock:
@@ -868,7 +827,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
}
}
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
@@ -876,7 +835,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu) = policy;
write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (has_target) {
if ((ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) ||
@@ -923,6 +882,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(void)
goto err_free_cpumask;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&policy->policy_list);
+ init_rwsem(&policy->rwsem);
+
return policy;
err_free_cpumask:
@@ -945,19 +906,12 @@ static void update_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
if (cpu == policy->cpu)
return;
- /*
- * Take direct locks as lock_policy_rwsem_write wouldn't work here.
- * Also lock for last cpu is enough here as contention will happen only
- * after policy->cpu is changed and after it is changed, other threads
- * will try to acquire lock for new cpu. And policy is already updated
- * by then.
- */
- down_write(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->cpu));
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
policy->last_cpu = policy->cpu;
policy->cpu = cpu;
- up_write(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->last_cpu));
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE
cpufreq_frequency_table_update_policy_cpu(policy);
@@ -1140,9 +1094,9 @@ static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: Failed to move kobj: %d", __func__, ret);
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(old_cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
cpumask_set_cpu(old_cpu, policy->cpus);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(old_cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
ret = sysfs_create_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, &policy->kobj,
"cpufreq");
@@ -1193,12 +1147,12 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
policy->governor->name, CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
#endif
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
if (cpus > 1)
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (cpu != policy->cpu) {
if (!frozen)
@@ -1239,9 +1193,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
return -EINVAL;
}
- lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ down_read(&policy->rwsem);
cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ up_read(&policy->rwsem);
/* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
if (cpus == 1) {
@@ -1256,10 +1210,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
}
if (!frozen) {
- lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ down_read(&policy->rwsem);
kobj = &policy->kobj;
cmp = &policy->kobj_unregister;
- unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ up_read(&policy->rwsem);
kobject_put(kobj);
/*
@@ -1451,16 +1405,19 @@ static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
*/
unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
unsigned int ret_freq = 0;
+ BUG_ON(!policy);
+
if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem))
return 0;
- lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ down_read(&policy->rwsem);
ret_freq = __cpufreq_get(cpu);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ up_read(&policy->rwsem);
up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
return ret_freq;
@@ -1684,11 +1641,11 @@ int cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
int ret = -EINVAL;
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, target_freq, relation);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
return ret;
}
@@ -1919,10 +1876,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
/* end old governor */
if (policy->governor) {
__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&new_policy->rwsem);
__cpufreq_governor(policy,
CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&new_policy->rwsem);
}
/* start new governor */
@@ -1931,10 +1888,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (!__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) {
failed = 0;
} else {
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&new_policy->rwsem);
__cpufreq_governor(policy,
CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&new_policy->rwsem);
}
}
@@ -1980,7 +1937,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
goto no_policy;
}
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
pr_debug("updating policy for CPU %u\n", cpu);
memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy));
@@ -2007,7 +1964,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
ret = __cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
no_policy:
@@ -2164,14 +2121,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_unregister_driver);
static int __init cpufreq_core_init(void)
{
- int cpu;
-
if (cpufreq_disabled())
return -ENODEV;
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
- init_rwsem(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu));
-
cpufreq_global_kobject = kobject_create();
BUG_ON(!cpufreq_global_kobject);
register_syscore_ops(&cpufreq_syscore_ops);
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index fcabc42..03735e7 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -85,6 +85,22 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
struct list_head policy_list;
struct kobject kobj;
struct completion kobj_unregister;
+
+ /*
+ * The rules for this semaphore:
+ * - Any routine that wants to read from the policy structure will
+ * do a down_read on this semaphore.
+ * - Any routine that will write to the policy structure and/or may take away
+ * the policy altogether (eg. CPU hotplug), will hold this lock in write
+ * mode before doing so.
+ *
+ * Additional rules:
+ * - Governor routines that can be called in cpufreq hotplug path should not
+ * take this sem as top level hotplug notifier handler takes this.
+ * - Lock should not be held across
+ * __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
+ */
+ struct rw_semaphore rwsem;
};
/* Only for ACPI */
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: create per policy rwsem instead of per cpu cpu_policy_rwsem
2013-09-17 15:50 [PATCH] cpufreq: create per policy rwsem instead of per cpu cpu_policy_rwsem Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-09-18 7:09 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-18 8:01 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat @ 2013-09-18 7:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Viresh Kumar; +Cc: rjw, linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel
On 09/17/2013 09:20 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> We have per-cpu cpu_policy_rwsem for cpufreq core, but we never use all of them.
> We always use rwsem of policy->cpu and so we can actually make this rwsem per
> policy instead.
>
> This patch does this change. With this change other tricky situations are also
> avoided now, like which lock to take while we are changing policy->cpu, etc.
>
> Suggested-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> Can be taken for 3.13.. Tested on my thinkpad with basic suspend/resume and
> hotplug tests.
>
> Was rebased on pm/linux-next with following additional patches:
> cpufreq: unlock correct rwsem while updating policy->cpu
> cpufreq: make return type of lock_policy_rwsem_{read|write}() as void
>
The code looks good, but the patch doesn't apply properly, because of the code
change that went in in your patch "cpufreq: Clear policy->cpus bits in
__cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()".
> @@ -1193,12 +1147,12 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
> policy->governor->name, CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
> #endif
>
> - lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
> + down_write(&policy->rwsem);
> cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
>
> if (cpus > 1)
> cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
> - unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
> + up_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> if (cpu != policy->cpu) {
> if (!frozen)
> @@ -1239,9 +1193,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
> + down_read(&policy->rwsem);
> cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
> - unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
> + up_read(&policy->rwsem);
>
The cpumask_clear_cpu() has been moved to _dev_finish() in Rafael's linux-next
tree. Hence the trouble. So kindly rework this patch on top of that.
> /* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
> if (cpus == 1) {
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index fcabc42..03735e7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,22 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
> struct list_head policy_list;
> struct kobject kobj;
> struct completion kobj_unregister;
> +
> + /*
> + * The rules for this semaphore:
> + * - Any routine that wants to read from the policy structure will
> + * do a down_read on this semaphore.
> + * - Any routine that will write to the policy structure and/or may take away
> + * the policy altogether (eg. CPU hotplug), will hold this lock in write
> + * mode before doing so.
> + *
> + * Additional rules:
> + * - Governor routines that can be called in cpufreq hotplug path should not
> + * take this sem as top level hotplug notifier handler takes this.
I think this comment is obsolete. I don't see the top-level hotplug notifier handler
(cpufreq_cpu_callback) acquiring the rwsem. Good to fix this comment while we are
at it, perhaps in a separate patch. (The comment above __cpufreq_remove_dev about
the policy-rwsem appears to be similarly out of date).
> + * - Lock should not be held across
> + * __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
> + */
> + struct rw_semaphore rwsem;
> };
>
> /* Only for ACPI */
>
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: create per policy rwsem instead of per cpu cpu_policy_rwsem
2013-09-18 7:09 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
@ 2013-09-18 8:01 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-09-18 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Srivatsa S. Bhat
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Lists linaro-kernel, Patch Tracking,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
On 18 September 2013 12:39, Srivatsa S. Bhat
<srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 09/17/2013 09:20 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The code looks good, but the patch doesn't apply properly, because of the code
> change that went in in your patch "cpufreq: Clear policy->cpus bits in
> __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()".
Hmm.. Because of the number of patches floating now a days, it is getting more
and more complex..
I will sort things out once Rafael starts picking stuff for 3.13..
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
>> + /*
>> + * The rules for this semaphore:
>> + * - Any routine that wants to read from the policy structure will
>> + * do a down_read on this semaphore.
>> + * - Any routine that will write to the policy structure and/or may take away
>> + * the policy altogether (eg. CPU hotplug), will hold this lock in write
>> + * mode before doing so.
>> + *
>> + * Additional rules:
>> + * - Governor routines that can be called in cpufreq hotplug path should not
>> + * take this sem as top level hotplug notifier handler takes this.
>
> I think this comment is obsolete. I don't see the top-level hotplug notifier handler
> (cpufreq_cpu_callback) acquiring the rwsem. Good to fix this comment while we are
> at it, perhaps in a separate patch. (The comment above __cpufreq_remove_dev about
> the policy-rwsem appears to be similarly out of date).
Yeah.. Will get that done, but will send these again only once Rafael is picking
stuff for 3.13..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] cpufreq: create per policy rwsem instead of per CPU cpu_policy_rwsem
@ 2013-10-18 13:40 Viresh Kumar
2013-10-18 16:15 ` Andrew Lunn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-10-18 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: rjw, andrew
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
Viresh Kumar, Rafael J. Wysocki
We have per-CPU cpu_policy_rwsem for cpufreq core, but we never use
all of them. We always use rwsem of policy->cpu and so we can
actually make this rwsem per policy instead.
This patch does this change. With this change other tricky situations
are also avoided now, like which lock to take while we are changing
policy->cpu, etc.
Suggested-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
I thought I should send it formally as well. Though Andrew hasn't given his
tested by until now. Rebased over your bleeding-edge branch.
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 110 +++++++++++++---------------------------------
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 14 ++++++
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index ec391d7..3f03dcb 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -48,47 +48,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN], cpufreq_cpu_governor);
#endif
/*
- * cpu_policy_rwsem is a per CPU reader-writer semaphore designed to cure
- * all cpufreq/hotplug/workqueue/etc related lock issues.
- *
- * The rules for this semaphore:
- * - Any routine that wants to read from the policy structure will
- * do a down_read on this semaphore.
- * - Any routine that will write to the policy structure and/or may take away
- * the policy altogether (eg. CPU hotplug), will hold this lock in write
- * mode before doing so.
- *
- * Additional rules:
- * - Governor routines that can be called in cpufreq hotplug path should not
- * take this sem as top level hotplug notifier handler takes this.
- * - Lock should not be held across
- * __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
- */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rw_semaphore, cpu_policy_rwsem);
-
-#define lock_policy_rwsem(mode, cpu) \
-static void lock_policy_rwsem_##mode(int cpu) \
-{ \
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu); \
- BUG_ON(!policy); \
- down_##mode(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->cpu)); \
-}
-
-lock_policy_rwsem(read, cpu);
-lock_policy_rwsem(write, cpu);
-
-#define unlock_policy_rwsem(mode, cpu) \
-static void unlock_policy_rwsem_##mode(int cpu) \
-{ \
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu); \
- BUG_ON(!policy); \
- up_##mode(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->cpu)); \
-}
-
-unlock_policy_rwsem(read, cpu);
-unlock_policy_rwsem(write, cpu);
-
-/*
* rwsem to guarantee that cpufreq driver module doesn't unload during critical
* sections
*/
@@ -683,14 +642,14 @@ static ssize_t show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf)
if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem))
return -EINVAL;
- lock_policy_rwsem_read(policy->cpu);
+ down_read(&policy->rwsem);
if (fattr->show)
ret = fattr->show(policy, buf);
else
ret = -EIO;
- unlock_policy_rwsem_read(policy->cpu);
+ up_read(&policy->rwsem);
up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
return ret;
@@ -711,14 +670,14 @@ static ssize_t store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem))
goto unlock;
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (fattr->store)
ret = fattr->store(policy, buf, count);
else
ret = -EIO;
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
unlock:
@@ -895,7 +854,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
}
}
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
@@ -903,7 +862,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu) = policy;
write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (has_target) {
if ((ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) ||
@@ -950,6 +909,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(void)
goto err_free_cpumask;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&policy->policy_list);
+ init_rwsem(&policy->rwsem);
+
return policy;
err_free_cpumask:
@@ -972,19 +933,12 @@ static void update_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
if (WARN_ON(cpu == policy->cpu))
return;
- /*
- * Take direct locks as lock_policy_rwsem_write wouldn't work here.
- * Also lock for last cpu is enough here as contention will happen only
- * after policy->cpu is changed and after it is changed, other threads
- * will try to acquire lock for new cpu. And policy is already updated
- * by then.
- */
- down_write(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->cpu));
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
policy->last_cpu = policy->cpu;
policy->cpu = cpu;
- up_write(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->last_cpu));
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
cpufreq_frequency_table_update_policy_cpu(policy);
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
@@ -1176,9 +1130,9 @@ static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: Failed to move kobj: %d", __func__, ret);
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(old_cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
cpumask_set_cpu(old_cpu, policy->cpus);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(old_cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
ret = sysfs_create_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, &policy->kobj,
"cpufreq");
@@ -1229,9 +1183,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
policy->governor->name, CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
#endif
- lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ down_read(&policy->rwsem);
cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ up_read(&policy->rwsem);
if (cpu != policy->cpu) {
if (!frozen)
@@ -1271,12 +1225,12 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
return -EINVAL;
}
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
if (cpus > 1)
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
/* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
if (cpus == 1) {
@@ -1291,10 +1245,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
}
if (!frozen) {
- lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ down_read(&policy->rwsem);
kobj = &policy->kobj;
cmp = &policy->kobj_unregister;
- unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ up_read(&policy->rwsem);
kobject_put(kobj);
/*
@@ -1474,19 +1428,22 @@ static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
*/
unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
unsigned int ret_freq = 0;
if (cpufreq_disabled() || !cpufreq_driver)
return -ENOENT;
+ BUG_ON(!policy);
+
if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem))
return 0;
- lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ down_read(&policy->rwsem);
ret_freq = __cpufreq_get(cpu);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+ up_read(&policy->rwsem);
up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
return ret_freq;
@@ -1710,11 +1667,11 @@ int cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
int ret = -EINVAL;
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, target_freq, relation);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
return ret;
}
@@ -1945,10 +1902,10 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
/* end old governor */
if (policy->governor) {
__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
__cpufreq_governor(policy,
CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
}
/* start new governor */
@@ -1957,10 +1914,10 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (!__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) {
failed = 0;
} else {
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
__cpufreq_governor(policy,
CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
}
}
@@ -2006,7 +1963,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
goto no_policy;
}
- lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
pr_debug("updating policy for CPU %u\n", cpu);
memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy));
@@ -2033,7 +1990,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
- unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
no_policy:
@@ -2190,14 +2147,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_unregister_driver);
static int __init cpufreq_core_init(void)
{
- int cpu;
-
if (cpufreq_disabled())
return -ENODEV;
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
- init_rwsem(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu));
-
cpufreq_global_kobject = kobject_create();
BUG_ON(!cpufreq_global_kobject);
register_syscore_ops(&cpufreq_syscore_ops);
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 0aba2a6c..6b457d0 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -85,6 +85,20 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
struct list_head policy_list;
struct kobject kobj;
struct completion kobj_unregister;
+
+ /*
+ * The rules for this semaphore:
+ * - Any routine that wants to read from the policy structure will
+ * do a down_read on this semaphore.
+ * - Any routine that will write to the policy structure and/or may take away
+ * the policy altogether (eg. CPU hotplug), will hold this lock in write
+ * mode before doing so.
+ *
+ * Additional rules:
+ * - Lock should not be held across
+ * __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
+ */
+ struct rw_semaphore rwsem;
};
/* Only for ACPI */
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: create per policy rwsem instead of per CPU cpu_policy_rwsem
2013-10-18 13:40 [PATCH] cpufreq: create per policy rwsem instead of per CPU cpu_policy_rwsem Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-10-18 16:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2013-10-21 4:58 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2013-10-18 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: rjw, andrew, linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 07:10:15PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> We have per-CPU cpu_policy_rwsem for cpufreq core, but we never use
> all of them. We always use rwsem of policy->cpu and so we can
> actually make this rwsem per policy instead.
>
> This patch does this change. With this change other tricky situations
> are also avoided now, like which lock to take while we are changing
> policy->cpu, etc.
>
> Suggested-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>
> I thought I should send it formally as well. Though Andrew hasn't given his
> tested by until now. Rebased over your bleeding-edge branch.
Hi Viresh
I tested on my Marvell Dove, which crashed and burned before with
cpufreq-bench. This version works fine so far. The benchmark has been
running for ten minutes, whereas before it was lucky to reach ten
seconds.
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
>
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 110 +++++++++++++---------------------------------
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 14 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index ec391d7..3f03dcb 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -48,47 +48,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN], cpufreq_cpu_governor);
> #endif
>
> /*
> - * cpu_policy_rwsem is a per CPU reader-writer semaphore designed to cure
> - * all cpufreq/hotplug/workqueue/etc related lock issues.
> - *
> - * The rules for this semaphore:
> - * - Any routine that wants to read from the policy structure will
> - * do a down_read on this semaphore.
> - * - Any routine that will write to the policy structure and/or may take away
> - * the policy altogether (eg. CPU hotplug), will hold this lock in write
> - * mode before doing so.
> - *
> - * Additional rules:
> - * - Governor routines that can be called in cpufreq hotplug path should not
> - * take this sem as top level hotplug notifier handler takes this.
> - * - Lock should not be held across
> - * __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
> - */
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rw_semaphore, cpu_policy_rwsem);
> -
> -#define lock_policy_rwsem(mode, cpu) \
> -static void lock_policy_rwsem_##mode(int cpu) \
> -{ \
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu); \
> - BUG_ON(!policy); \
> - down_##mode(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->cpu)); \
> -}
> -
> -lock_policy_rwsem(read, cpu);
> -lock_policy_rwsem(write, cpu);
> -
> -#define unlock_policy_rwsem(mode, cpu) \
> -static void unlock_policy_rwsem_##mode(int cpu) \
> -{ \
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu); \
> - BUG_ON(!policy); \
> - up_##mode(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->cpu)); \
> -}
> -
> -unlock_policy_rwsem(read, cpu);
> -unlock_policy_rwsem(write, cpu);
> -
> -/*
> * rwsem to guarantee that cpufreq driver module doesn't unload during critical
> * sections
> */
> @@ -683,14 +642,14 @@ static ssize_t show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf)
> if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - lock_policy_rwsem_read(policy->cpu);
> + down_read(&policy->rwsem);
>
> if (fattr->show)
> ret = fattr->show(policy, buf);
> else
> ret = -EIO;
>
> - unlock_policy_rwsem_read(policy->cpu);
> + up_read(&policy->rwsem);
> up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
>
> return ret;
> @@ -711,14 +670,14 @@ static ssize_t store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
> if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem))
> goto unlock;
>
> - lock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
> + down_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> if (fattr->store)
> ret = fattr->store(policy, buf, count);
> else
> ret = -EIO;
>
> - unlock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
> + up_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
> unlock:
> @@ -895,7 +854,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> }
> }
>
> - lock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
> + down_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>
> @@ -903,7 +862,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu) = policy;
> write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>
> - unlock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
> + up_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> if (has_target) {
> if ((ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) ||
> @@ -950,6 +909,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(void)
> goto err_free_cpumask;
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&policy->policy_list);
> + init_rwsem(&policy->rwsem);
> +
> return policy;
>
> err_free_cpumask:
> @@ -972,19 +933,12 @@ static void update_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
> if (WARN_ON(cpu == policy->cpu))
> return;
>
> - /*
> - * Take direct locks as lock_policy_rwsem_write wouldn't work here.
> - * Also lock for last cpu is enough here as contention will happen only
> - * after policy->cpu is changed and after it is changed, other threads
> - * will try to acquire lock for new cpu. And policy is already updated
> - * by then.
> - */
> - down_write(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->cpu));
> + down_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> policy->last_cpu = policy->cpu;
> policy->cpu = cpu;
>
> - up_write(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, policy->last_cpu));
> + up_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> cpufreq_frequency_table_update_policy_cpu(policy);
> blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
> @@ -1176,9 +1130,9 @@ static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("%s: Failed to move kobj: %d", __func__, ret);
>
> - lock_policy_rwsem_write(old_cpu);
> + down_write(&policy->rwsem);
> cpumask_set_cpu(old_cpu, policy->cpus);
> - unlock_policy_rwsem_write(old_cpu);
> + up_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> ret = sysfs_create_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, &policy->kobj,
> "cpufreq");
> @@ -1229,9 +1183,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
> policy->governor->name, CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
> #endif
>
> - lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
> + down_read(&policy->rwsem);
> cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
> - unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
> + up_read(&policy->rwsem);
>
> if (cpu != policy->cpu) {
> if (!frozen)
> @@ -1271,12 +1225,12 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
> + down_write(&policy->rwsem);
> cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
>
> if (cpus > 1)
> cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
> - unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
> + up_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> /* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
> if (cpus == 1) {
> @@ -1291,10 +1245,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
> }
>
> if (!frozen) {
> - lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
> + down_read(&policy->rwsem);
> kobj = &policy->kobj;
> cmp = &policy->kobj_unregister;
> - unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
> + up_read(&policy->rwsem);
> kobject_put(kobj);
>
> /*
> @@ -1474,19 +1428,22 @@ static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
> */
> unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
> unsigned int ret_freq = 0;
>
> if (cpufreq_disabled() || !cpufreq_driver)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> + BUG_ON(!policy);
> +
> if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem))
> return 0;
>
> - lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
> + down_read(&policy->rwsem);
>
> ret_freq = __cpufreq_get(cpu);
>
> - unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
> + up_read(&policy->rwsem);
> up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
>
> return ret_freq;
> @@ -1710,11 +1667,11 @@ int cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> {
> int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> - lock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
> + down_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, target_freq, relation);
>
> - unlock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu);
> + up_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1945,10 +1902,10 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> /* end old governor */
> if (policy->governor) {
> __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
> - unlock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
> + up_write(&policy->rwsem);
> __cpufreq_governor(policy,
> CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
> - lock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
> + down_write(&policy->rwsem);
> }
>
> /* start new governor */
> @@ -1957,10 +1914,10 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> if (!__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) {
> failed = 0;
> } else {
> - unlock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
> + up_write(&policy->rwsem);
> __cpufreq_governor(policy,
> CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
> - lock_policy_rwsem_write(new_policy->cpu);
> + down_write(&policy->rwsem);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2006,7 +1963,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
> goto no_policy;
> }
>
> - lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
> + down_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> pr_debug("updating policy for CPU %u\n", cpu);
> memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy));
> @@ -2033,7 +1990,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
>
> ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
>
> - unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
> + up_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
> cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> no_policy:
> @@ -2190,14 +2147,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_unregister_driver);
>
> static int __init cpufreq_core_init(void)
> {
> - int cpu;
> -
> if (cpufreq_disabled())
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> - init_rwsem(&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu));
> -
> cpufreq_global_kobject = kobject_create();
> BUG_ON(!cpufreq_global_kobject);
> register_syscore_ops(&cpufreq_syscore_ops);
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 0aba2a6c..6b457d0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,20 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
> struct list_head policy_list;
> struct kobject kobj;
> struct completion kobj_unregister;
> +
> + /*
> + * The rules for this semaphore:
> + * - Any routine that wants to read from the policy structure will
> + * do a down_read on this semaphore.
> + * - Any routine that will write to the policy structure and/or may take away
> + * the policy altogether (eg. CPU hotplug), will hold this lock in write
> + * mode before doing so.
> + *
> + * Additional rules:
> + * - Lock should not be held across
> + * __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
> + */
> + struct rw_semaphore rwsem;
> };
>
> /* Only for ACPI */
> --
> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: create per policy rwsem instead of per CPU cpu_policy_rwsem
2013-10-18 16:15 ` Andrew Lunn
@ 2013-10-21 4:58 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-10-21 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Andrew Lunn
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Lists linaro-kernel, Patch Tracking,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki
On 18 October 2013 21:45, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
> Hi Viresh
>
> I tested on my Marvell Dove, which crashed and burned before with
> cpufreq-bench. This version works fine so far. The benchmark has been
> running for ten minutes, whereas before it was lucky to reach ten
> seconds.
>
> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Hi Andrew,
Thanks a lot for reporting and testing this patch :) ..
Hopefully it will not cause any issues ones Rafael applies it for linux-next.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-21 4:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-17 15:50 [PATCH] cpufreq: create per policy rwsem instead of per cpu cpu_policy_rwsem Viresh Kumar
2013-09-18 7:09 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-09-18 8:01 ` Viresh Kumar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-18 13:40 [PATCH] cpufreq: create per policy rwsem instead of per CPU cpu_policy_rwsem Viresh Kumar
2013-10-18 16:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2013-10-21 4:58 ` Viresh Kumar
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.