From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753678Ab2FWB5n (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:57:43 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:22463 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752138Ab2FWB5m (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:57:42 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=T6AOvo2Q c=1 sm=0 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=XQbtiDEiEegA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=VclqXo_85qrA3VLzZEgA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29 Message-ID: <1340416659.27036.290.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf fixes From: Steven Rostedt To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , "H. Peter Anvin" Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:57:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FE51325.8090408@linux.intel.com> References: <20120622133650.GA24136@gmail.com> <20120622183827.GA8014@virgo.local> <20120622190632.GB8014@virgo.local> <1340394896.27036.258.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <86448d73-2e19-416f-8104-ce72aa5d76eb@email.android.com> <1340407123.27036.265.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4FE51325.8090408@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1+b1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 17:51 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > I would also worry about the compiler being able to inline a function > containing one of these, but that's a compiler thing, not a CPU type of > thing. You missed the beginning of the thread where we talked about the fact that gcc will not put a mcount (or fentry) in an inlined function, so that's not a worry. -- Steve