From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: Re: Bug#638172: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [qemu-dm:3205] Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:56:40 +0100 Message-ID: <1314255400.17978.724.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> References: <1313577856.13030.17.camel@scarafaggio> <1314003611.5010.400.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20110824202400.GA27448@dumpdata.com> <1314221049.17978.709.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <1314255147.4943.5.camel@scarafaggio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1845083162==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1314255147.4943.5.camel@scarafaggio> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Giuseppe Sacco Cc: "638172@bugs.debian.org" <638172@bugs.debian.org>, Ben Hutchings , xen-devel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============1845083162== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-pKr9Mo1qFerwCRw0YTAR" --=-pKr9Mo1qFerwCRw0YTAR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 08:52 +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Il giorno mer, 24/08/2011 alle 22.24 +0100, Ian Campbell ha scritto: > [...] > > Giuseppe, are you able to reproduce the issue you are seeing at will? I= f > > I build a test kernel would you be able to try it? You are using a -686 > > kernel right (as opposed to amd64). OOI which hypervisor flavour do you > > use? >=20 > Unfortunately not. This server crashes often, but I do not have any > method to let it crashes. The worst case is when it crashes just after > reboot, the opposite was after a month from reboot. >=20 > But, I may use a different kernel and let the server goes until crashes: > no problem in rebooting it for kernel update. Thanks that would be useful, I'll put something together and let you know. > And yes, it is a 32bit debian squeeze system on a 64 bit Athlon cpu. But are you running the amd64 or 686 flavour of the hypervisor? Both are available in 32bit Debian. FWIW I would always recommend running the 64 bit hypervisor (even with 32 bit dom0) if you are able to. Ian. --=20 Ian Campbell Once the toothpaste is out of the tube, it's hard to get it back in. -- H. R. Haldeman --=-pKr9Mo1qFerwCRw0YTAR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJOVfInAAoJEOxjaZd5B0+oy8oP/RAj4dUITr4a8NikSRssxbTC tHHYZUG8v622Gxsb1AOdjMgyweAVKGk7Y0vy4+on+dKn2QWoMAF1BIRcrJPqOEbn iRJdYRpS5fTR+HEQnwRPCC+uycEnpoSx3FdZJssh4uVY7Tx88DmCmF94nogi8YAY iIIPGr4YDqWi1Areh9NUpGP6c9g9laRlGFKkM5SJ36kF2ud3cP5ddCOpHwbbYzCm P/0IjUXsFwRy1FIdSVpRYX6R+3vw0I3So3uZIVZTPsF9cpe5olmc7WAHVCJhusXQ ImztUohGhthIeLChxawFGTDmR7iQROiFA23jfOUzrIW4ZRvji4ok82BB5MwoDXIU tYI61rZvjesoHBZ/4dal9uGABiQohQjZUNAExtmuymldR28fdz0ZLD5bhqTLsY+X 2STQoJBNB7qhslK5i4x6yVDJvO1g1A7UvXhjTPhlu/0bVbnyoTM0B2U5V83nOEem BgXsN6PISu5s52Xc/kPgAMi3kQ+uSDOizypKGiwFCcFXZxsHArZA2XdgGwIWlVwL qxpuFuXtMSWoMzZgfQf2GGsUO55EwIELPrTCTb9QlVZTEVGfVjaTOgSuyGdmZ7h6 Lr2szW8ihNR+XRBRMoMO6bUtRm2B3GCUTtQWkz3xip8VU3znaPtogVYTzeeXfjv7 73UhQd6Fbk1KbF1YC+mx =lRG+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-pKr9Mo1qFerwCRw0YTAR-- --===============1845083162== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel --===============1845083162==--