All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
To: Nifty Fedora Mitch <niftyfedora@niftyegg.com>
Cc: "MOgWai46[Saurceful of Secrets]" <street41@gmail.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Western Digital RE3
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:17:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243430246.5740.80.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090527012441.GA3506@tosh2egg.wr.niftyegg.com>

On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 18:24 -0700, Nifty Fedora Mitch wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 04:17:34PM +0200, MOgWai46[Saurceful of Secrets] wrote:
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I would replace two Western Digital Velociraptor 300 GB 10K Rpm that
> > in the latest five month gave me a lot problems. Periodically i must
> > re-sync the linux raid 1 array because one of the two Velociraptor
> > stop to work. Someone have an experience with the Western Digital Raid
> > Edition 3 on a machine with linux software Raid 1?
>  
> Do inspect the drive and drive logs with WD diagnostic software.
> 
> Do inspect the hardware... cables, connectors etc....
> 
> Is it always the same disk that is triggering an error?
> Is the drive firmware up to date?
> 
> Software RAID 1 does not place any strange load on a drive the way
> other RAID models might so unless the drive is well out of warranty 
> look for the obvious....

He is not the first person to have serious problems with the
velociraptors, so they are probably not too good to use for raid.

> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-27 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-25 14:17 Western Digital RE3 MOgWai46[Saurceful of Secrets]
2009-05-25 19:20 ` Richard Scobie
2009-05-26  7:41   ` Henry, Andrew
2009-05-27 23:29     ` Bill Davidsen
2009-05-28  6:17       ` Henry, Andrew
2009-05-28 13:24         ` Bill Davidsen
2009-05-28 13:29           ` Bill Davidsen
2009-05-25 21:32 ` Redeeman
2009-05-27  1:24 ` Nifty Fedora Mitch
2009-05-27 13:17   ` Redeeman [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-27 15:15 russ

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1243430246.5740.80.camel@localhost \
    --to=redeeman@metanurb.dk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niftyfedora@niftyegg.com \
    --cc=street41@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.