From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933146AbYDOV1t (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:27:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932726AbYDOV1g (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:27:36 -0400 Received: from nn7.de ([85.214.94.156]:58404 "EHLO nn7.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933104AbYDOV1f (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:27:35 -0400 Subject: RE: [Bug #10117] 2.6.25-current-git sometimes hangs on boot -dual-core Sony Vaio From: Soeren Sonnenburg To: "Pallipadi\, Venkatesh" Cc: "Rafael J\. Wysocki" , Adrian Bunk , "Carlos R\. Mafra" , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEEE17FF1@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <200804152233.39079.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080415204500.GD1677@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <200804152303.45320.rjw@sisk.pl> <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEEE17FD4@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com> <1208294294.7851.109.camel@localhost> <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEEE17FF1@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:27:21 +0000 Message-Id: <1208294841.7851.119.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 14:24 -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Soeren Sonnenburg [mailto:kernel@nn7.de] > >Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 2:18 PM > >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh > >Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki; Adrian Bunk; Carlos R. Mafra; Linux > >Kernel Mailing List > >Subject: RE: [Bug #10117] 2.6.25-current-git sometimes hangs > >on boot -dual-core Sony Vaio > > > >On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 14:09 -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: [...] > >> Both of them probabilistically hang early in the boot. > >> On both !CPUIDLE and hpet=disable seems to be working around the > >> problem. > >> Both are Core 2 Duo based with 64 bit kernel. > >> > >> One difference I saw was that #10377 fails on battery. That may be > >> because when on battery CPUs may be running at lower freq during boot > >> and that is probably helping this problem in terms of timing. > > > >FWIW, this macbook pro1,1 has only a core 1 duo, so x86 == 32bit... > >Soeren > > > > Sorry. When I said Core 2, I was referring to Carlos and his updates on > #10117. Sorry, I meant that this could be something general and not a amd64 specific change... which I thought could be useful in tracing this... Soeren