All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Barubary" <barubary@cox.net>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: ISO9660 bug and loopback driver bug
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 03:37:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <006001c1beb9$ea412690$a7eb0544@CX535256D> (raw)

First, the ISO9660 bug.  The ISO file system driver in Linux doesn't handle
leap years correctly.  It assumes all years divisible by 4 are leap years,
which is incorrect.  For those that don't know the right algorithm, all
years that (are divisible by 4) and ((not divisible by 100), or (divisible
by 400)) are leap years.  ISO file dates on or after March 1, 2100 will be 1
day off when viewed under Linux as a result.  The bug is in fs/isofs/util.c,
function iso_date().  This is a very low priority bug, because a) nobody
cares about ISO file date accuracy including me; and b) it shouldn't matter
until 2100.  Anyone bored enough to fix this? :)  I guess I could do it...

Now the loopback bug.  Files whose size is greater than 2^31-1 don't work
with the loopback driver.  It fails with strange errors, like "device not
found".  This bug prevents DVD-ROM .iso files from being mounted as either
UDF or ISO file systems - the particular use I encountered it with.  It's a
bit higher of a priority than the ISO9660 date bug, because it prevents
useful features from working.  Still not too important though.

The above were encountered on 2.4.17, and are both in 2.4.18.

-- Barubary


             reply	other threads:[~2002-02-26 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-26 11:37 Barubary [this message]
2002-02-26 11:54 ` ISO9660 bug and loopback driver bug Jesper Juhl
2002-02-26 12:01 ` Rainer Ellinger
2002-02-26 12:08   ` Barubary
2002-02-26 12:17     ` Change that to an NTFS bug not loopback Barubary
2002-02-27  0:03     ` Richard Russon
2002-02-26 12:04 ` ISO9660 bug and loopback driver bug Alan Cox
2002-02-26 12:02   ` Barubary
2002-02-26 12:37     ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='006001c1beb9$ea412690$a7eb0544@CX535256D' \
    --to=barubary@cox.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.